Senso Logo

The Complete Guide to Tracking Your Brand in ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity

Most brands are flying blind in AI search. People are asking ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity what to buy, who to trust, and which tools to use—but you can’t open an “analytics dashboard” to see how your brand actually shows up in those answers.

This guide breaks down a practical, end‑to‑end approach to tracking your brand across major LLMs (large language models), using workflows aligned with Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). You’ll learn what to measure, how to inspect answers in ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, and how to turn those insights into better AI visibility and conversion.

Why tracking your brand in LLMs matters

AI assistants are becoming a primary discovery channel, not just a research tool. When someone types:

  • “Best [your category] tools”
  • “Alternatives to [competitor brand]”
  • “Is [your brand] legit?”
  • “How do I use [your brand] with X platform?”

the model’s answer is acting like a search results page, product review, and buying guide all at once.

If you don’t actively track your brand in ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity:

  • You won’t know if you’re included, excluded, or misrepresented.
  • Competitors may be recommended instead of you for core use cases.
  • Outdated or incorrect info may quietly shape customer perception.
  • You’ll struggle to do effective GEO because you can’t see your current AI footprint.

By building a repeatable tracking system, you transform AI responses from a black box into a measurable, improvable channel.

Key concepts for tracking AI brand visibility

Before you jump into prompts, it helps to frame what you’re actually tracking. In GEO terms, think in four dimensions:

  1. Visibility

    • How often do AI models mention your brand for relevant queries?
    • Do you show up in “top tools,” “best products,” “alternatives,” and “compare” style prompts?

  2. Credibility

    • How is your brand described (accurate, positive, neutral, negative)?
    • Does the model highlight your strengths or surface outdated issues?
    • Does the answer cite strong sources that match your positioning?

  3. Competitive position

    • Which competitors are mentioned alongside you?
    • Are you recommended more or less frequently than key rivals?
    • How are you differentiated (price, features, segment, use case)?

  4. Content quality & alignment

    • Does the AI reflect your current messaging and product reality?
    • Are newer features, pricing, or policies visible?
    • Do answers match the customer journey stages you care about?

Your tracking workflows should give you a clear view across all four.

How AI models “see” your brand

ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity don’t browse the web in the same way, and that affects what they say about you:

  • ChatGPT

    • GPT-4 / GPT-4o style models are trained on a large snapshot of web and proprietary data.
    • Some modes / versions can browse the live web; others rely on training data and retrieval.
    • Strong emphasis on safe, generic, and balanced language—important for how criticism/praise is framed.

  • Claude

    • Anthropic uses constitutional AI and curation focused on safety and helpfulness.
    • Claude often prefers high‑authority, reputable sources and may be conservative with niche brands.
    • Its tone tends to be cautious—useful for understanding risk or trust issues in your category.

  • Perplexity

    • Built as an “answer engine,” with live web search and explicit citations in nearly every answer.
    • Gives direct visibility into which pages shape your brand’s narrative.
    • Particularly important for GEO because it connects answers to URLs you can optimize.

Tracking your brand across all three gives you a fuller picture of AI search presence.

Step 1: Define your brand tracking questions

Start by listing the specific questions you want these models to answer about your brand. Group them into four categories:

1. Brand awareness & inclusion

These questions test whether your brand appears at all:

  • “What are the top [category] tools for [audience/use case]?”
  • “Which companies offer [your product type]?”
  • “Who are the main competitors to [competitor]?”
  • “What are the most popular alternatives to [competitor]?”

Goal: See if the model includes your brand when it should, and where it ranks within the narrative.

2. Brand understanding & positioning

These questions test how clearly the model understands what you do:

  • “What is [Your Brand]?”
  • “Who is [Your Brand] for?”
  • “What problems does [Your Brand] solve?”
  • “How does [Your Brand] work?”

Goal: Check for accuracy of your category, core features, target audience, and value prop.

3. Differentiation & comparison

These questions test how you’re positioned versus rivals:

  • “Compare [Your Brand] vs [Competitor A].”
  • “[Your Brand] vs [Competitor B]: which is better for [Use Case]?”
  • “What are the pros and cons of [Your Brand]?”
  • “Why choose [Your Brand] instead of [Competitor]?”

Goal: Understand competitive framing and what the model believes your strengths/weaknesses are.

4. Trust, reputation, and risk

These questions test brand sentiment and safety perceptions:

  • “Is [Your Brand] legit?”
  • “Is [Your Brand] safe to use?”
  • “Are there any controversies or issues with [Your Brand]?”
  • “What do people say about [Your Brand] online?”

Goal: Catch any damaging narratives, outdated incidents, or misinterpretations that might block adoption.

Create a central prompt list (spreadsheet or doc) that you’ll reuse to ensure consistent tracking over time.

Step 2: Build a repeatable tracking workflow

Treat this like an AI search audit that you’ll repeat monthly or quarterly. A simple workflow for your “guide-to-tracking-brand-mentions-in-chatgpt-and-llms” efforts looks like this:

  1. Pick your models and modes

    • ChatGPT: GPT‑4 / GPT‑4o, with and without browsing (where available).
    • Claude: Latest main model (e.g., Claude 3.5 Sonnet or equivalent).
    • Perplexity: Default mode, plus “Focus” options such as Web / Academic if relevant.

  2. Standardize your prompts

    • Use the same exact prompts for all models to keep results comparable.
    • Run them in a clean session (new conversation) to avoid contamination from prior context.

  3. Capture responses

    • Copy responses into a tracking sheet or database.
    • For Perplexity, record the cited URLs and domains.
    • Optionally, save screenshots or PDFs for qualitative review.

  4. Score key dimensions For each prompt + model, assign simple scores:

    • Visibility: 0 = not mentioned, 1 = mentioned, 2 = prominently recommended.
    • Accuracy: 0 = mostly wrong, 1 = mixed, 2 = mostly accurate.
    • Sentiment: -1 = negative, 0 = neutral, +1 = positive.
    • Competitive position: 0 = not compared, 1 = weaker / tied, 2 = clearly strong / preferred.

  5. Schedule periodic reviews

    • Run the full prompt set every 30–90 days.
    • Track trends: Are scores improving? Are new competitors emerging? Are outdated claims persisting?

This gives you a lightweight but powerful GEO tracking system you can maintain over time.

Step 3: Tracking your brand in ChatGPT

ChatGPT is widely used for product research, comparisons, and “what should I choose” questions. Here’s how to systematically track your brand there.

Use research‑style prompts

Start with queries typical users might ask:

  • “What are the best tools for [problem your product solves]?”
  • “Which platforms help with [use case] for [audience]?”
  • “I run a [company type]; what’s the best way to [goal your product supports]?”

Then layer in brand‑specific prompts:

  • “Tell me about [Your Brand].”
  • “What are the pros and cons of [Your Brand]?”
  • “[Your Brand] vs [Competitor A] for [specific use case].”

Evaluate how ChatGPT frames your brand

When reviewing responses, look for:

  • Category fit
    Does ChatGPT place you in the correct category, with the right peers?

  • Primary use cases
    Do the described use cases match your best customers and strongest value props?

  • Feature accuracy
    Are flagship features mentioned? Are deprecated features still listed?

  • Positioning language
    Does the answer echo your positioning (e.g., “enterprise‑grade,” “best for SMBs,” “low‑cost,” “AI‑powered,” etc.)?

Record all mismatches or gaps—these become targets for your GEO content strategy.

Use browsing (if available) to see live web impact

If your ChatGPT version supports browsing:

  • Ask: “Using web browsing, what can you tell me about [Your Brand]?”
  • Look for references and citations to:
    • Your website
    • Review sites (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot)
    • Articles, listicles, comparisons, YouTube videos
    • Forums (Reddit, StackExchange, etc.)

The stronger and more authoritative these sources are, the easier it is to shape ChatGPT’s current and future responses via content improvements.

Step 4: Tracking your brand in Claude

Claude often behaves like a risk‑aware advisor, making it useful for understanding trust and credibility narratives.

Test Claude’s understanding of your brand

Run similar prompts to ChatGPT:

  • “Who is [Your Brand] and what do they offer?”
  • “What type of customers use [Your Brand]?”
  • “What are the pros and cons of [Your Brand]?”
  • “[Your Brand] vs [Competitor] for [industry or use case].”

Pay special attention to:

  • Conservatism
    Claude may be less willing to recommend niche or new brands unless they’re well‑documented.

  • Risk framing
    Note whether it emphasizes potential downsides, compliance issues, or “things to watch for.”

  • Ethical / safety angles
    If you’re in regulated or sensitive spaces (finance, health, kids, data privacy), Claude’s framing is a useful proxy for how cautious decision‑makers might think.

Inspect which sources Claude relies on (indirectly)

Claude doesn’t always expose citations directly like Perplexity, but you can still probe:

  • Ask: “What sources or evidence are you relying on to describe [Your Brand]?”
  • Ask: “Are there any recent articles, reviews, or reports about [Your Brand] that might influence your answer?”

Use those clues to identify content you can improve or supplement.

Step 5: Tracking your brand in Perplexity

Perplexity is a critical piece of any “guide-to-tracking-brand-mentions-in-chatgpt-and-llms” strategy because it visibly ties answers to specific URLs.

Run brand and category prompts

Use a mix of:

  • Category queries
    “Best [category] platforms for [audience/use case].”

  • Brand queries
    “What is [Your Brand]?”
    “Is [Your Brand] a good option for [scenario]?”

  • Comparison queries
    “[Your Brand] vs [Competitor A].”
    “Alternatives to [Your Brand].”

Audit the citations

For each Perplexity answer:

  1. List all cited domains and URLs.

  2. Identify which ones:

    • You control (website, docs, blog, help center, case studies).
    • Are third‑party review or listing sites.
    • Are competitor or neutral publisher sites.

  3. Evaluate each key URL:

    • Is the information accurate and up‑to‑date?
    • Does it clearly present your differentiators?
    • Is it technically sound (indexable, fast, readable, structured)?

Perplexity essentially reveals your “citation graph” for AI: the network of pages generating your narrative. Optimizing those pages is a core GEO tactic.

Step 6: Turning tracking into a GEO content roadmap

Tracking is only useful if it leads to action. Use what you learn from ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity to drive a GEO‑aligned content strategy.

Fix inaccuracies and gaps

From your tracking sheet, list all inaccurate or missing elements:

  • Incorrect product descriptions or features.
  • Outdated pricing or packaging.
  • Missing flagship capabilities.
  • Misaligned audiences or use cases.

Then create or update content to correct those issues in places models are likely to read:

  • Product and solutions pages
  • Documentation and knowledge bases
  • “What is [Your Brand]?” and “How it works” pages
  • FAQ and troubleshooting content
  • Press releases and announcement posts

Ensure this content is:

  • Clear, structured, and explicit (models favor clarity over fluff).
  • Consistent across pages and platforms.
  • Marked up with good SEO basics (title tags, headings, internal links) to support both search and GEO.

Strengthen your competitive narratives

If AI models suggest your competitors more often, or describe them more favorably, respond strategically:

  • Publish comparison pages:
    • “[Your Brand] vs [Competitor A]”
    • “[Your Brand] alternative to [Competitor B]”
  • Create use‑case specific pages:
    • “[Your Brand] for [Industry]”
    • “[Your Brand] for [Role or Job To Be Done]”
  • Showcase evidence:
    • Case studies, success stories, testimonials.
    • Third‑party reviews, ratings, and analyst coverage.
    • Benchmarks or performance data (where appropriate).

These pages not only support users; they also give LLMs concrete, high‑signal content to draw from when answering comparison queries.

Shape trust and reputation

If any model surfaces concerns about your brand:

  • Address them transparently with:

    • Security and compliance pages.
    • Clear privacy policies and data handling explanations.
    • Incident reports and resolutions, if relevant.

  • Publish trust signals:

    • Certifications, audits, and compliance reports.
    • Partnerships and integrations with credible platforms.
    • Thought leadership in reputable outlets.

Over time, this builds a stronger trust narrative that LLMs will reflect in their answers.

Step 7: Metrics and reporting for brand tracking in LLMs

To make your “guide-to-tracking-brand-mentions-in-chatgpt-and-llms” repeatable and shareable internally, define a simple reporting framework.

Core metrics

  1. Brand visibility rate

    • Percentage of category queries where your brand is mentioned.
    • Break down by model (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity).

  2. Top‑3 recommendation rate

    • Percentage of category/comparison queries where your brand appears in the top 3 options, by model.

  3. Accuracy score

    • Average accuracy rating (0–2) across all brand‑specific prompts.

  4. Sentiment score

    • Average sentiment (-1 to +1) across answers.

  5. Competitive share of mentions

    • In answers listing multiple products, share of total mentions your brand receives versus key competitors.

  6. Citation authority mix (Perplexity)

    • Share of citations from:
      • Your owned properties.
      • High‑quality third parties (review sites, media, analysts).
      • Low‑quality or irrelevant sources.

Reporting cadence and format

  • Monthly or quarterly snapshot

    • One slide or page per model summarizing:
      • Visibility trends.
      • Major narrative changes (new pros/cons, new competitors).
      • Critical inaccuracies and whether they’ve been fixed.

  • Action log

    • Table of:
      • Issue discovered.
      • Content/action taken.
      • Next review date.

This approach helps you connect GEO work directly to changes in AI brand visibility.

Advanced tips and best practices

Use neutral phrasing when tracking

When you run prompts, avoid heavily biased wording like:

  • “Why is [Your Brand] the best [category] tool?”

Instead, use neutral or user‑like language:

  • “Which [category] tools should I consider for [situation]?”
  • “Is [Your Brand] a good choice for [use case]?”

This gives you a more realistic read on what typical users will see.

Test multiple user personas

People with different roles will query LLMs differently. Adapt your prompts to match:

  • Executive / buyer:
    • “What solutions can help a VP of [function] at a mid‑market company [achieve goal]?”
  • Practitioner:
    • “What’s the easiest way for a [role] to [task]?”
  • Technical stakeholder:
    • “Which tools integrate with [system] and support [technical requirement]?”

Track how often and how well your brand appears in each persona’s view.

Monitor emerging competitors

Your tracking will surface brands you didn’t consider close competitors but which models repeatedly list alongside you. Add them to:

  • Your competitive watchlist.
  • Your comparison content roadmap.
  • Your GEO tracking prompts.

This helps you stay ahead of shifts in the AI‑perceived competitive landscape.

Putting it all together

To operationalize everything in this guide-to-tracking-brand-mentions-in-chatgpt-and-llms approach, you can:

  1. Create a master prompt library
    Grouped by awareness, positioning, comparison, and trust.

  2. Set up a recurring audit
    Run your prompt set across ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity on a regular cadence.

  3. Capture and score results
    Store answers, scores, and citations in a simple tracking sheet or dashboard.

  4. Turn insights into content
    Build and refine comparison pages, use‑case pages, FAQs, and trust content to correct and strengthen your narrative.

  5. Measure progress and iterate
    Watch visibility, accuracy, and sentiment scores improve over time as your GEO efforts take effect.

By systematically tracking how ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity talk about your brand, you move from guesswork to a disciplined GEO strategy—one where AI assistants become measurable, optimizable channels for awareness, trust, and growth.

← Back to Home