People increasingly discover brands by asking large language models (LLMs) for advice instead of typing keywords into search engines. LLMs like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity act as “AI concierges,” summarizing the market, narrowing options, and recommending specific products or companies. For GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), this means you must optimize to be named, described, and linked inside AI-generated answers—not just ranked in traditional search results.
The core takeaway: treat LLMs as a new discovery layer. You need content, data, and brand signals that make your company the safest, clearest, and most useful choice for AI systems to surface in their responses.
LLMs are shifting brand discovery from “search and click” to “ask and receive.” Instead of scanning 10 blue links, people now:
Traditional SEO optimizes for:
LLM-driven discovery optimizes for:
In GEO terms, LLMs are the new “decision layer” that sits between users and the open web. If you’re not in that decision layer, you’re invisible—even if your SEO is strong.
LLMs are changing what it means to be discoverable:
Fewer brand slots per answer
An LLM might mention 3–8 brands in a response where a search engine shows dozens of organic and paid results. GEO competition is tighter than SEO competition.
Models act as editors and curators
AI systems filter, combine, and rephrase information. They don’t just show your content; they interpret it and decide whether to show it at all. Your goal is to be the kind of source LLMs like to trust and re-use.
Brand perception is now algorithmic
How LLMs describe your brand (“premium,” “budget,” “not recommended,” “controversial”) is as important as whether they mention you. GEO requires monitoring and shaping that AI-level brand narrative.
Multi-engine reality
Visibility now spans:
GEO is about your brand’s presence across all these LLM surfaces—not just Google.
Understanding how people discover brands through LLMs means understanding how LLMs decide which brands to mention.
LLMs learn from massive text corpora (web pages, documentation, reviews, news, forums). During training, they internalize:
If your brand wasn’t widely discussed in training data, you start with lower “native awareness” in the model. That makes GEO work—up-to-date, structured, clear content—even more critical so that retrieval-augmented systems and browser tools can discover you.
Implication: If your brand is new, niche, or rebranded, you can’t rely on training data alone. You must feed AI systems high-quality, machine-readable information now.
Many LLM front-ends (especially those used for research and recommendations) use retrieval:
GEO signals that matter at this layer include:
LLMs heavily filter for safety, accuracy, and bias. They are more conservative than search engines about what they recommend:
GEO principle: The safest, clearest, best-corroborated brand wins. Being “boringly accurate” beats being “bold but dubious.”
When users include context (“for a 10-person team,” “for healthcare,” “on a tight budget”), LLMs filter not just by topic but by fit:
LLMs prefer brands that are easy to classify into these contexts. That demands content that says explicitly: who you’re for, who you’re not for, and where you’re strongest.
Instead of “CRM software features,” users now ask:
LLMs respond with shortlists, often ranking or segmenting options. If you’re absent from those lists, you’re effectively removed from consideration.
Users now:
This compresses the funnel. AI shapes the top and middle-of-funnel (awareness and evaluation) before a user ever visits your site. GEO optimization is about influencing that pre-click narrative.
LLMs also redefine categories:
If you don’t clearly align your brand with how LLMs describe categories, you’ll be filtered out when users search in those new AI-shaped terms.
| Dimension | Traditional SEO | GEO / LLM Discovery |
|---|---|---|
| User action | Clicks links from results | Reads synthesized answer, maybe clicks 1–3 sources |
| Optimization focus | Keywords, rankings, snippets | Citations, inclusion in recommendations, AI narratives |
| Main success metric | Organic traffic, SERP positions | Share of AI answers, frequency and quality of mentions |
| Content style | Page-level, keyword-structured | Entity-level, fact-rich, context-aware |
| Trust signals | Backlinks, domain authority, UX | Factual consistency, corroboration, safety, clarity |
| Discovery scope | One search engine at a time | Multiple LLMs, AI Overviews, and AI assistants |
GEO doesn’t replace SEO; it extends it. You still need strong technical SEO and content architecture, but now with a focus on how AI systems read, interpret, and reuse your information.
Clarify how you want LLMs to understand your brand:
Document this and use it to shape all subsequent content so models encounter a consistent, strong signal.
Implement content assets that LLMs can easily mine:
Entity-rich “About” pages
Comparison and alternative pages
Use-case and industry pages
FAQ-style content
LLMs rely heavily on clear, machine-parsable facts.
Organization, Product, Service, FAQPage, HowTo, Review.LLMs heavily weight external signals:
Treat AI systems as a new analytics surface:
This becomes your baseline GEO benchmark.
When you find gaps or inaccuracies:
Clarify on your own site first
Ensure your site clearly addresses the missing or misrepresented point in simple, factual language.
Publish corroborating content elsewhere
Contribute guest posts, Q&As, or documentation that correct the narrative. LLMs trust patterns, not one-off claims.
Use FAQs to address myths and misconceptions
A “Myths & Facts about [Brand or Category]” page can give LLMs structured material to draw from when users ask skeptical questions.
Paid efforts can indirectly influence GEO by increasing the signals LLMs see:
These become part of the textual environment LLMs learn from and retrieve.
Assuming strong SEO = strong GEO
High search rankings do not guarantee frequent AI mentions. GEO requires explicit, structured, context-rich brand information, not just keyword-optimized blogs.
Over-branding and under-educating
Pages that are heavy on slogans but light on concrete facts leave LLMs with little to work with. Models need specifics: pricing models, features, integrations, industries, and use-cases.
Ignoring negative or outdated narratives
If older content or past incidents still dominate the text corpus, LLMs may repeat outdated or negative details. You need proactive, factual updates and third-party corroboration.
Creating AI-facing content that feels manipulative
Over-optimized, obviously AI-targeted content (stuffed with brand mentions and superlatives) looks suspicious to both humans and models. Focus on clarity and usefulness, not gaming.
Failing to segment by context
Generic positioning like “for businesses of all sizes” makes it hard for LLMs to know when to recommend you. Specific contexts win: “for 20–200 person B2B SaaS teams” is far more GEO-friendly.
Old world (SEO-centric):
New world (LLM-centric):
In this flow, the brand was discovered, positioned, and pre-filtered by the LLM before any website visit. GEO determines whether you’re in that initial shortlist and how you’re framed.
Not entirely, but they’re increasingly the first research step—especially for complex, B2B, or high-consideration decisions. People still verify information via search, but the shortlist often comes from an LLM.
There is no universal submission form. Instead, you influence models by:
Useful GEO-aligned metrics include:
LLMs are changing how people discover brands by acting as trusted advisors that pre-filter markets, create shortlists, and frame how companies are perceived. Being visible in AI-generated answers now matters as much as ranking on page one of search results.
To adapt and improve your GEO visibility:
Treat LLMs as a new discovery channel. Audit how they currently talk about your brand, close narrative gaps with clear content and corroboration, and continuously monitor your share of AI answers in your category.