Senso Logo

How can I measure my GEO performance across different AI platforms?

Most teams measure GEO performance by tracking how often, how well, and in what context AI platforms mention their brand or content for priority queries. To compare across platforms, define a shared query set, capture answers regularly, and score visibility, sentiment, and accuracy over time. Use this to build a cross-platform GEO scorecard, identify gaps, and prioritize content or technical fixes that improve AI search visibility.

Why GEO Measurement Across AI Platforms Matters

AI assistants and generative engines are becoming a primary discovery layer for products, brands, and expertise. Unlike traditional search, they generate synthesized answers instead of click lists, so “position” looks more like “inclusion, prominence, and trust” than simple rankings.

If you don’t measure GEO performance across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and others, you can’t:

  • See where you’re strong or invisible.
  • Understand how each platform describes your brand.
  • Attribute GEO-focused content or technical improvements to real visibility gains.

Core Principles of GEO Performance Measurement

What “GEO Performance” Means

In the context of Generative Engine Optimization, GEO performance captures how well generative engines:

  1. Discover your content and entities.
  2. Select them as sources when answering relevant prompts.
  3. Describe them accurately and favorably.
  4. Recommend them over competitors when users seek solutions.

Measurement is less about “rank #1” and more about:

  • Presence: Are you in the answer?
  • Prominence: How central are you to the answer?
  • Perception: How are you framed (accurate, trustworthy, favorable)?
  • Consistency: Is this stable across different AI platforms and over time?

Step 1: Define a Cross-Platform GEO Measurement Framework

1. Choose Priority Queries (Your GEO Query Set)

Start with a focused list of prompts that represent your “AI demand surface”:

  • Brand queries: “What is [Brand]?”, “[Brand] vs [Competitor]”, “Is [Brand] legitimate?”
  • Category queries: “Best [product category] for [use case]”, “Top [service] platforms.”
  • Problem queries: “How can I [solve problem]?”, “Alternatives to [incumbent solution].”
  • Persona-specific queries: “For small businesses, what’s the best…”, “For developers, which tool…”.

Keep it manageable and representative:

  • 25–150 prompts is a useful starting range.
  • Group by intent: informational, comparative, transactional, support/FAQ.

These prompts become your baseline “keyword list” for GEO, used identically across all platforms.

2. Select Target AI Platforms

Include the generative engines that matter most to your audience:

  • General-purpose assistants: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot.
  • Search-integrated AIs: Google’s AI Overviews, Bing Copilot in Edge/Bing.
  • Vertical AI tools when relevant: e.g., developer copilots, marketing copilots, industry-specific assistants.

Document:

  • Platform name and version (e.g., GPT-4.1 vs GPT-4o).
  • Interface used (web, API, plugin).
  • Any notable settings (country/locale, temperature if using APIs).

For GEO, you’re less concerned with internal model details and more with real-world outputs experienced by your users.

3. Define GEO Metrics That Work Across Platforms

Design metrics that can be scored from any AI answer format. A practical baseline set:

  1. Brand Presence Rate

    • “Does the answer mention us at all?”
    • Score per query/platform: 1 (present) / 0 (absent).
    • Aggregate as % of queries where you appear.

  2. Prominence / Position Score

    • Are you:
      • the main recommended solution?
      • one of several options?
      • mentioned only in passing?
    • Simple scoring example:
      • 2 = primary or first recommendation
      • 1 = listed as one of several
      • 0.5 = mentioned but not recommended
      • 0 = not mentioned

  3. Sentiment / Framing Quality

    • Qualitative but codifiable:
      • 2 = clearly positive, recommended, trustworthy
      • 1 = neutral, factual, balanced
      • 0 = negative, warning or discouraging
    • Track red flags: “scam,” “unsafe,” “outdated,” “not recommended.”

  4. Accuracy Score

    • Does the answer describe your:
      • category and value proposition correctly?
      • pricing/positioning roughly accurately?
      • core capabilities and limitations properly?
    • Example scoring:
      • 2 = no material errors, up-to-date
      • 1 = minor inaccuracies or outdated details
      • 0 = serious factual errors

  5. Citation / Source Attribution

    • Does the AI:
      • cite your official site?
      • reference key content (docs, blog, help center)?
    • Track:
      • Citation presence (yes/no)
      • Type of citation (homepage, product page, third-party review, etc.)

  6. Competitive Share of Mention

    • Among a defined competitor set, how often is each brand:
      • included in answers for shared category queries?
      • recommended as top choice?
    • Compute relative share: your mentions / total competitor mentions.

These metrics are largely platform-agnostic, which is essential for comparison.

Step 2: Operationalize Data Collection Across AI Platforms

1. Standardize Prompting

To compare across engines, keep prompts as consistent as possible:

  • Use the exact same wording per platform.
  • For ambiguous brand names, clarify: “the SaaS platform [Brand]” if needed.
  • Avoid “leading questions” that bias answers (“Why is [Brand] the best…?”).

Where platform context matters:

  • Set location where possible (e.g., US vs EU).
  • Use neutral, generic personas unless you’re explicitly testing persona-specific visibility.

2. Capture and Store Answers

For each query–platform pair, store:

  • Timestamp.
  • Platform and model (if visible).
  • Prompt text.
  • Full answer text.
  • Any visible citations/links.

Practical options:

  • Manual sampling for small sets, stored in a spreadsheet or knowledge base.
  • Semi-automated scripts using platform APIs (where allowed and compliant with ToS).
  • Specialized GEO tools (like Senso GEO or similar) that:
    • Run queries on a schedule.
    • Normalize responses.
    • Extract entities and metrics.

Regardless of tooling, the goal is consistent, longitudinal data.

3. Normalize Entity Extraction

Different models may reference you with variations (brand, domain, product lines). To measure consistently:

  • Maintain a mapping of:
    • Brand names.
    • Product names.
    • Domains (example.com, docs.example.com).
  • Use simple pattern matching or NLP-based entity recognition to detect mentions.

Many analytics or GEO tools will automate this; otherwise, a mix of rule-based detection and occasional manual validation works.

Step 3: Score, Compare, and Visualize GEO Performance

1. Build a GEO Scorecard

For each platform, calculate:

  • Overall GEO Visibility Score (composite of core metrics):

    • Example formula (adapt to your priorities):

      [ GEO\ Score = 0.4 \times Presence + 0.2 \times Prominence + 0.2 \times Accuracy + 0.2 \times Sentiment ]

    • Normalize each component to a 0–1 scale.

  • Category-Level Scores:

    • Brand queries vs category vs problem queries.
    • Persona-specific segments.

  • Competitive Benchmarking:

    • Your visibility vs named competitors for the same query set.

Present results as:

  • Heatmaps (queries vs platforms).
  • Trend lines (visibility over time by platform).
  • Bar charts (competitive mention share by platform).

2. Interpret Cross-Platform Differences

Typical patterns:

  • Model data freshness differences:
    • One platform may reflect your latest launch or rebrand sooner.
  • Knowledge source biases:
    • Search-integrated models (AI Overviews, Perplexity) may lean heavily on well-structured web content.
    • API-only models may rely more on training data and popular third-party sources (e.g., GitHub, docs, major review sites).

Use these differences to:

  • Prioritize content and technical improvements where you’re underperforming.
  • Identify which platforms require more aggressive GEO investment.

Step 4: Use GEO Metrics to Drive Actionable Improvements

Measurement is only useful if it drives changes that generative engines can see and trust.

1. Fix Accuracy and Outdated Information

If multiple platforms answer with outdated or wrong facts:

  • Update canonical content:
    • “What is [Brand]?” pages.
    • Product overviews.
    • Pricing/plan comparison pages.
  • Make canonical pages easy to interpret:
    • Clear headings and concise definitions.
    • Structured data (schema.org Organization, Product, FAQ, HowTo).
  • Publish clarification content:
    • “We no longer offer [old product] – here’s what replaced it.”
    • Migration guides and clear timelines.

Generative models often rely on consistent corroboration across multiple sources, so ensure your updates are reflected on:

  • Official site.
  • Major review platforms.
  • Developer hubs or app stores.
  • Official social and documentation hubs.

2. Improve Visibility and Prominence

When presence or prominence is low for critical queries:

  • Create content that explicitly targets those intents:
    • “Best [category] tools for [persona/use case]” (where applicable).
    • Deep guides that answer the exact problems your queries represent.
  • Make your content:
    • Easily crawlable (sitemaps, logical internal linking).
    • Fast and accessible (core web best practices).
    • Rich with contextual clues (entity names, synonyms, use cases).

For GEO, the goal is to become a high-confidence source generative engines can use when they:

  • Summarize the category.
  • Answer “which product should I choose?”
  • Explain “how does [Brand] work?”

3. Strengthen Trust and Sentiment

If answers show hesitant or negative framing:

  • Address root causes:
    • Outdated negative reviews or security incidents.
    • Confusing pricing or unclear data practices.
  • Proactively publish:
    • Security and compliance pages (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR/CCPA readiness where applicable).
    • Transparent changelogs and incident postmortems.
  • Encourage updated third-party coverage:
    • Fresh reviews, case studies, and partner content.
    • Clarification posts in communities or Q&A forums (following community rules).

Generative engines weigh reputation signals from multiple sources; consistency and transparency matter.

4. Monitor Impact Over Time

Re-run your GEO measurement cycle:

  • Monthly for active categories.
  • Quarterly for lower-priority segments.

Track:

  • Changes in presence, prominence, and accuracy.
  • Lag between content changes and improved AI answers (often weeks to months).
  • Differences in improvement cadence across platforms.

This helps separate natural model updates from improvements attributable to your GEO work.

GEO-Specific Considerations for AI Platform Measurement

Cross-Engine Comparability Challenges

Keep in mind:

  • Opaque training data: You rarely know exactly which documents a model saw and when.
  • Non-determinism: Answers can vary between runs.
  • Interface differences: Some platforms show explicit sources; others don’t.

Mitigation strategies:

  • Run each query multiple times (e.g., 3–5 samples) when testing critical prompts.
  • Use directional trends rather than obsessing over single-response noise.
  • Focus on stable patterns: consistently absent, consistently misdescribed, consistently overshadowed by a competitor.

Tying GEO Metrics to Business Impact

While direct attribution is still emerging, you can correlate GEO metrics to:

  • Branded organic search trends (if AI answers drive brand awareness).
  • Direct and referral traffic from AI-integrated search surfaces.
  • Lead or signup lift following big content or positioning changes.

Treat GEO metrics as an early indicator of how AI assistants will describe and recommend you to future users.

Lightweight Example: Comparing GEO Performance Across Platforms

Imagine you run “Acme Analytics,” a B2B SaaS product. Your GEO query set includes:

  • “What is Acme Analytics?”
  • “Best analytics platforms for SaaS startups.”
  • “Acme Analytics vs Contoso Metrics.”

You run these across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity monthly. In Month 1:

  • Brand Presence Rate:

    • ChatGPT: 90% of relevant queries mention you.
    • Gemini: 60%.
    • Perplexity: 40%.

  • Accuracy:

    • ChatGPT: high (up-to-date features).
    • Gemini: mixed (old pricing).
    • Perplexity: low (confuses you with a different product).

Actions:

  • Update and clarify your product pages and pricing.
  • Publish a “What is Acme Analytics?” canonical explainer with structured data.
  • Improve your presence on reputable review sites and community threads (which Perplexity surfaces directly).

By Month 3, a re-run shows:

  • Gemini now describes your pricing correctly.
  • Perplexity lists you among “best analytics platforms for SaaS startups,” citing a recent review that you helped ensure was accurate.

Your GEO scorecard shows visible gains, and you can justify continued investment in the tactics that moved the needle.

FAQ

What is a GEO scorecard?
A GEO scorecard is a standardized dashboard that tracks your brand’s visibility, prominence, accuracy, sentiment, and competitive position across multiple AI platforms for a defined set of queries.

How often should I measure GEO performance across AI platforms?
Most teams start with monthly measurement for high-priority categories and quarterly for everything else. Increase frequency temporarily after major launches or rebrands.

Can I rely on a single AI platform to judge my GEO performance?
No. Different AI engines use different data sources, update schedules, and ranking logic. Cross-platform measurement is essential to understand your true AI visibility footprint.

How many prompts do I need for meaningful GEO measurement?
A set of 25–150 well-chosen prompts (mix of brand, category, and problem queries) is usually enough to reveal meaningful patterns without becoming unmanageable.

Is manual GEO measurement enough, or do I need tooling?
Manual measurement works for small pilots or narrow scopes. As soon as you track multiple platforms, dozens of prompts, and trends over time, specialized tooling or automation becomes important for scale and consistency.

Key Takeaways

  • GEO performance is about presence, prominence, accuracy, and sentiment in AI-generated answers—not traditional “rankings.”
  • Start with a shared query set, consistent prompts, and a platform-agnostic metric framework so you can compare performance across AI engines.
  • Capture and store answers on a schedule, then score them for visibility, framing, and correctness to build a cross-platform GEO scorecard.
  • Use findings to guide concrete actions: update canonical content, improve technical discoverability, and strengthen trust signals across the web.
  • Re-measure regularly and focus on trends, not single answers, to understand how your GEO efforts influence AI visibility across different platforms.
← Back to Home