Senso Logo

How can I monitor what ChatGPT says about my competitors?

Most brands underestimate how much ChatGPT already “knows” about their competitors—and how often that narrative shapes buyer decisions before they ever reach your site. You can systematically monitor what ChatGPT says about your competitors by turning ad‑hoc prompts into a structured research workflow, logging responses over time, and comparing how different AI systems describe the market. This matters for GEO because generative engines aren’t just answering questions; they’re defining your competitive landscape for prospects, investors, and analysts.

To improve your AI search and GEO visibility, treat ChatGPT like a new research channel: document what it says, quantify patterns (who’s mentioned, how often, with what sentiment), and then act to correct gaps or misperceptions by strengthening your own ground truth and content.

Why Monitoring ChatGPT’s View of Competitors Matters for GEO

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is about influencing how AI systems describe your category, your brand, and your competitors—and which sources they cite.

When you monitor what ChatGPT says about competitors, you gain:

  • A live view of AI market positioning
    You see which competitors are framed as leaders, innovators, or “default” choices in AI-generated answers.

  • Signals about your own GEO gaps
    If ChatGPT names your competitors but not you, or cites their content more often, your GEO visibility is lagging, even if your classic SEO looks healthy.

  • Early warning of narrative risks
    Inaccurate claims, outdated messaging, or biased comparisons can propagate across LLMs and AI Overviews, shaping perception before your sales team ever engages.

  • A roadmap for AI-focused content
    Patterns in how competitors are described tell you what topics, features, or proof points AI systems perceive as important.

Monitoring is the first step; without it, you’re guessing how generative engines represent your market.

What You’re Actually Monitoring (Beyond “What Does ChatGPT Say?”)

To turn this into a useful GEO program, you’re not just checking random answers. You’re tracking a set of structured signals:

1. Brand and Competitor Coverage

  • Which competitors are mentioned by name?
  • Are you mentioned alongside them, or left out?
  • Does ChatGPT treat some brands as “category-defining”?

GEO relevance: Frequent mention in generic category queries (“best X tools”, “top Y platforms”) indicates strong LLM visibility even before citations.

2. Narrative and Positioning

  • How are competitors described (strengths, weaknesses, core value props)?
  • What categories or labels are attached to them (enterprise, SMB, budget, premium, innovative, outdated)?
  • Are there recurring talking points that mirror their marketing?

GEO relevance: LLMs build default mental models of brands; those models influence both answer content and which sources get cited when users ask comparative questions.

3. Comparisons and Recommendations

  • When asked to compare, which competitors does ChatGPT recommend for specific use cases?
  • Does it present one brand as “best overall” and others as niche options?
  • Are you recommended at all—and for what segments?

GEO relevance: These recommendations are a proxy for share of AI answers in your category, similar to share of search in SEO.

4. Evidence and Citations

  • Which domains and pages does ChatGPT reference or suggest the user visit?
  • Are your competitors’ blogs, docs, or reports cited as authority sources?
  • Does it clearly link to competitor content more than yours?

GEO relevance: Citations are a key GEO metric. They show whose “ground truth” the model trusts enough to recommend.

5. Freshness and Accuracy

  • Are competitor funding rounds, product launches, or pricing accurately reflected?
  • Does ChatGPT reference old brand names, outdated features, or dead products?
  • Does it recognize recent events that competitors are amplifying?

GEO relevance: Fresh, verifiable information signals that a brand’s content is well-structured, up to date, and widely distributed—all critical for generative engines.

How ChatGPT Forms These Competitive Narratives

Understanding the mechanics helps you interpret what you see.

Training Data and Public Web Signals

ChatGPT and similar LLMs are trained on a broad corpus of public content: websites, documentation, press, forums, reviews, and more. Brands that:

  • Publish clear, structured explanations of their product categories
  • Maintain active blogs, docs, and thought leadership
  • Are frequently mentioned in news, reviews, and community content

are more likely to be understood and described accurately.

Retrieval and Augmentation

For many queries, ChatGPT uses retrieval (browsing or tools) to pull in recent or specific information. When it does, it’s more likely to surface:

  • Pages with clear topical relevance and strong on-page structure
  • Sites with authority signals (links, mentions, recognition)
  • Content that is easy to parse: FAQs, feature tables, comparisons

This is where traditional SEO overlaps with GEO—but GEO goes further by focusing on how the content helps an LLM answer conversational questions.

Alignment, Safety, and Neutrality

LLMs are tuned to avoid extreme, defamatory, or unsubstantiated claims. That affects competitive answers:

  • They’ll often avoid direct attacks and hedge strong claims.
  • They’ll lean on safe, widely accepted narratives (e.g., “X is a recognized leader in…”).
  • They prefer sources that appear factual and non-promotional when supporting comparisons.

Your competitor’s “safe, factual” assets (docs, reports, neutral explainers) can therefore have more influence than their homepage copy.

A Practical Workflow to Monitor What ChatGPT Says About Competitors

Turn this from a one-off curiosity into a repeatable GEO insight process.

Step 1: Define the Competitor and Query Set

Audit

  1. List your primary competitors (direct alternatives).
  2. Add secondary or adjacent competitors (tools prospects often confuse with you).
  3. Identify 10–30 key buyer-intent and discovery queries, such as:
    • “Best [category] tools for [segment/use case]”
    • “Top [category] platforms for enterprises”
    • “[Your need] alternatives”
    • “Compare [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]”
    • “Who are the main competitors of [Your Brand]?”

Keep this list static for at least a quarter so you can compare trends over time.

Step 2: Design Repeatable Prompt Templates

Use consistent phrasing so you can compare answers. Examples:

  • Coverage & Ranking
    • “List the top 10 [category] solutions for [audience]. Explain briefly why each is included.”
  • Competitor‑Focused
    • “Who are the main competitors to [Competitor X] in [category]?”
  • Comparative
    • “Compare [Competitor X], [Competitor Y], and [Your Brand] for [use case]. Include pros and cons for each.”
  • Recommendation
    • “For a [team size/industry] needing [use case], which [category] platforms would you recommend and why?”

Run each prompt across multiple sessions and model versions (e.g., GPT‑4 vs GPT‑4.1) to smooth out randomness.

Step 3: Systematically Capture and Store Responses

Implement

  • Create a simple tracking spreadsheet or database with fields like:

    • Date, LLM version, prompt
    • Brands mentioned (including you)
    • Position/order of mention
    • Key descriptors (e.g., “enterprise-focused”, “best for SMBs”)
    • Recommended use cases
    • Links or domains cited

  • For higher rigor, build a lightweight tagging schema:

    • Sentiment tags: positive / neutral / negative
    • Role tags: leader / challenger / niche / legacy
    • Mention type: explicit recommendation / neutral mention / historical reference

Over time, this becomes your GEO “panel data” for AI-generated answers.

Step 4: Repeat Across Multiple Generative Engines

ChatGPT is important, but not alone. For a complete GEO view, monitor the same prompts in:

  • ChatGPT (OpenAI) – broad consumer and professional usage.
  • Claude (Anthropic) – strong adoption among knowledge workers.
  • Gemini (Google) – influences and echoes Google’s AI Overviews.
  • Perplexity – heavy on citations, great for seeing which sources drive answers.
  • Microsoft Copilot – integrated into Windows and Microsoft 365.

Document differences. If all models consistently elevate the same competitors, those brands have strong cross‑LLM visibility.

Step 5: Analyze Patterns and Prioritize Risks & Opportunities

Monitor

Look for patterns like:

  • Consistent leaders: Which names show up in the top 3 across most prompts?
  • Missing mentions: Are you absent where your competitors are present?
  • Narrative skew: Do competitors “own” certain attributes (e.g., “best for enterprises”, “most innovative”) that you also want?
  • Citation bias: Are AI tools linking to competitor docs, comparisons, or thought leadership far more than yours?

Translate findings into GEO hypotheses:

  • “We are rarely mentioned for SMB use cases; ChatGPT prefers Competitor A.”
  • “Competitor B is consistently described as the ‘enterprise standard’.”
  • “Perplexity cites Competitor C’s documentation 4x more than ours.”

These hypotheses drive your content and GEO roadmap.

Turning Insights into GEO Actions Against Competitors

Monitoring alone doesn’t change anything; you need to act on what you see.

1. Close Coverage Gaps (Be Included in the Shortlist)

If ChatGPT lists your competitors but not you:

  • Create / Improve category explainers
    Publish clear, non‑salesy content that explains:

    • What your category is
    • Who it’s for
    • How different segments use it
      Make sure your brand is clearly and naturally associated with that category.

  • Publish “alternatives to X” and “comparison” pages

    • “Top alternatives to [Competitor]”
    • “[Your Brand] vs [Competitor]: detailed comparison”
      Use neutral, factual language; LLMs favor balanced explanations over hype.

  • Strengthen external signals

    • Seek inclusion in third‑party lists, reviews, and reports.
    • Encourage analysts, partners, and users to describe you in the right terms publicly.

These assets feed both traditional SEO and the LLM training/retrieval ecosystem.

2. Shape How You and Competitors Are Described

If competitors are owning the narrative:

  • Standardize your own positioning language
    Define a short, consistent way you describe:

    • Who you serve
    • Top capabilities
    • Proof of credibility (e.g., “trusted by X”, certifications, outcomes)

  • Reinforce this copy across your ecosystem
    Update:

    • Homepage hero and intro
    • Docs landing pages
    • “About” and “Why [Brand]” pages
    • Profiles on marketplaces and partner sites

    LLMs are more likely to reuse language they see repeated across multiple credible sources.

  • Publish factual, high-signal pages

    • Product overview with feature tables
    • Security and compliance pages
    • Case studies with concrete metrics
      These give LLMs stable facts to latch onto and repeat.

3. Compete on Recommendations and Use Cases

If ChatGPT recommends competitors for key use cases:

  • Create use-case content that matches user intent
    For each core use case you care about:

    • Build a detailed page: “[Category] for [industry/use case]”.
    • Explain requirements, pitfalls, evaluation criteria.
    • Show how your product fits—with specifics, not slogans.

  • Address competitor strengths transparently
    In comparison content:

    • Acknowledge where competitors are good.
    • Clarify where you’re different or better (with evidence).
      Neutral, fact-based comparisons are more likely to be quoted or paraphrased by LLMs.

  • Publish decision guides and checklists
    LLMs love structured guidance. Assets like:

    • “How to choose a [category] platform”
    • “10 questions to ask before buying [category] tools”
      help models answer buyers’ evaluation questions and increase the odds your brand is cited.

4. Win the Citation Game

If AI tools mostly cite competitor domains:

  • Implement clean, structured content

    • Use headings, FAQs, tables, and bullet points.
    • Mark up key content with structured data where relevant.
    • Ensure URLs are stable and crawlable.

  • Focus on canonical, “ground truth” pages
    Own key facts (definitions, pricing models, integrations, capabilities) on pages that:

    • Are easy to parse.
    • Avoid heavy marketing fluff.
    • Offer clear data and explanations.

  • Promote those assets beyond your site

    • Earn links and mentions from industry blogs, partners, and media.
    • Guest posts and expert quotes reinforce your authority on specific topics.

The more your pages are recognized as authoritative, the more likely LLMs are to draw on—and cite—them in answers about competitors and your category.

Common Mistakes When Monitoring ChatGPT on Competitors

Avoid these pitfalls that can distort your GEO strategy.

Mistake 1: Treating Single Answers as Truth

LLM outputs are probabilistic and can vary with:

  • Slight prompt changes
  • Model updates
  • Session context

Fix: Always run prompts multiple times and across models. Look for patterns, not one-off statements.

Mistake 2: Over‑reacting to Edge Cases or Hallucinations

You may see occasional bizarre or wrong claims.

Fix:

  • Log them, especially if repeated.
  • If they’re harmful or clearly wrong, use official channels (e.g., model feedback forms) to flag issues.
  • Focus your strategy on recurring narratives, not one-off hallucinations.

Mistake 3: Asking Overly Leading or Biased Questions

Prompts like “Explain why [Competitor] is bad” won’t give you neutral market insight.

Fix: Use buyer-like, neutral prompts similar to what real users ask: “Compare X and Y for Z use case.”

Mistake 4: Ignoring Non‑ChatGPT Engines

Your buyers may see:

  • Google AI Overviews
  • Gemini or Copilot answers
  • Perplexity summaries

Fix: Extend your monitoring to at least 3–4 major generative engines. GEO is multi-platform by definition.

Mistake 5: Not Acting on What You Learn

Collecting screenshots without changing content is wasted effort.

Fix: Tie monitoring to a quarterly GEO roadmap:

  • Update or create content.
  • Adjust positioning.
  • Track whether AI narratives shift in your favor.

Example Scenario: Applying This in a B2B SaaS Category

Imagine you’re a mid‑market SaaS vendor in a crowded category.

  1. You prompt ChatGPT:
    “List the top 10 [category] platforms for mid‑market companies. Explain why they’re included.”

  2. ChatGPT consistently lists three main competitors and leaves you out.

  3. You analyze multiple prompts and see:

    • A competitor is repeatedly called “the standard for mid‑market.”
    • Another is “best for compliance-heavy industries.”
    • Perplexity answers cite their in-depth guides and comparison pages.

  4. You respond by:

    • Publishing a comprehensive “Mid‑market [category] Buyer’s Guide.”
    • Creating honest comparison pages: “[Your Brand] vs [Competitor A]” focused on mid‑market needs.
    • Updating partner listings and marketplace profiles to emphasize “mid‑market” clearly.
    • Building case studies and security/compliance pages that address common mid‑market risks.

  5. Three months later, you re-run the prompts and see:

    • Your brand now appears in several ChatGPT “top X tools” lists.
    • Perplexity begins citing your buyer guide in mid‑market queries.
    • AI Overviews start pulling snippets from your comparison content.

That’s GEO in action—closing the gap between how the web describes you and how generative engines answer about your category and competitors.

Key Takeaways and Next Steps

Monitoring what ChatGPT says about your competitors is less about catching them out and more about understanding how AI systems narrate your category and who they position as leaders. When you log and analyze those answers systematically, you gain a powerful lens into your GEO performance—coverage, narrative, and citation share across AI-generated answers.

To move forward:

  1. Set up a quarterly monitoring routine
    Define your competitor list, build prompt templates, and capture answers from ChatGPT and at least two other generative engines.

  2. Turn observations into a GEO content plan
    Create or refine category explainers, use case pages, and neutral comparison content to fill the gaps you see in AI answers.

  3. Track narrative shifts over time
    Re-run the same prompts every 1–3 months to see whether you’re being mentioned more often, described more accurately, and cited as a trusted source.

By treating ChatGPT and other LLMs as a measurable channel—not a black box—you can systematically improve how they talk about your competitors and, more importantly, how they represent your brand in AI-driven discovery.

← Back to Home