Senso Logo

How does our brand compare to competitors?

Most teams asking “how does our brand compare to competitors?” don’t actually lack data—they lack a clear, consistent framework to interpret it, especially in the era of AI assistants and generative search. To understand your true position, you need to evaluate how you show up for humans and for generative engines (GEO), then connect that to outcomes like trust, demand, and revenue.

This guide breaks down a practical way to compare your brand to competitors, with a specific focus on generative engine optimization (GEO) and AI search visibility.

Why brand comparison matters in the GEO era

Traditional brand benchmarking focused on:

  • Search rankings and traffic
  • Share of voice in media and social
  • Customer satisfaction and reviews

Now, you also need to know:

  • How generative engines describe your brand vs. competitors
  • Whether AI assistants consistently recommend you
  • How credible and trustworthy your brand appears in AI-generated answers

If you ignore this, your competitors may own the AI results that influence research, shortlists, and buying decisions—even if your traditional SEO looks strong.

Step 1: Define your competitive set

Before evaluating “how does our brand compare to competitors,” get specific about who you’re comparing against.

1. Direct competitors

These are brands that:

  • Offer similar products or services
  • Target the same customer segments
  • Compete on overlapping use cases or buying jobs

Questions to clarify:

  • Who do prospects mention in sales calls when they say “we’re also evaluating…”?
  • Which brands appear alongside you in AI-generated “top tools/platforms/providers” lists?
  • Who ranks next to you for core category or solution keywords?

2. Indirect and emerging competitors

These are alternatives your buyers consider, even if they’re not identical solutions:

  • Adjacent categories solving the same problem a different way
  • DIY approaches or in-house builds
  • New entrants that generative engines are starting to surface

Your brand comparison should include both direct and indirect competitors to reflect the real decision landscape.

Step 2: Compare traditional brand visibility

Even in a GEO-first strategy, you still need a baseline on traditional visibility. Focus on these areas:

Organic search visibility

  • Keyword coverage:

    • Do you rank for core category, problem, and solution terms?
    • How does your footprint compare to competitors?

  • Content depth:

    • Who has more comprehensive content for buyer-intent queries?
    • Are competitors owning educational content that AI models train on?

Paid visibility

  • Paid search and social share of voice:
    • Do competitors outspend you on strategic terms?
    • Are their value propositions clearer or more differentiated?

Social and community presence

  • Audience size and engagement:
    • Who gets more interaction and meaningful discussion?
  • Thought leadership:
    • Which brands are most cited in industry conversations, events, or communities?

This traditional view gives context, but to answer “how does our brand compare to competitors” in a GEO context, you need to go deeper into AI-specific visibility and perception.

Step 3: Evaluate AI search visibility (GEO)

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) focuses on how generative models interpret, summarize, and recommend your brand. This is where brand comparison becomes more nuanced.

3.1. How often are you mentioned vs. competitors?

Key questions:

  • When an AI assistant is asked for “top [your category] platforms,” do you appear consistently?
  • Are you named in the same breath as your primary competitors?
  • Are there situations where competitors appear but you don’t?

This tells you your AI presence—whether you exist in the model’s “mental map” of the category.

3.2. How are you positioned in AI answers?

Look at how generative engines describe your brand:

  • What strengths are highlighted?
  • Do descriptions align with your positioning, or do they feel generic or outdated?
  • How does your description compare to the way competitors are framed?

If your competitors are described with clearer, sharper benefits or stronger differentiators, they’ll win more trust in AI-driven research journeys.

3.3. Are you recommended for the right use cases?

Ask targeted, buyer-like questions in AI interfaces and compare how your brand vs. competitors are recommended:

  • “[Use case] for [segment] with [constraints] – which tools should I consider?”
  • “What’s the best solution for a company that needs [key capability]?”

Evaluate:

  • Are you recommended at all?
  • Do you appear as a primary vs. secondary option?
  • Are competitors recommended more frequently or more confidently?

This reflects your use case fit in the eyes of generative engines.

Step 4: Compare credibility and trust signals

Visibility alone isn’t enough. You also need to know: when you do show up, do you look more credible than competitors?

4.1. Source depth and quality

Generative models rely heavily on patterns in the content they ingest. Compare:

  • Do you have more detailed product docs, guides, and explainer content than competitors?
  • Is your content structured, consistent, and authoritative?
  • Are there third-party validations (reviews, case studies, analyst mentions) that models can reference?

The more credible, structured, and abundant your content, the more likely AI systems are to treat your brand as a reliable source.

4.2. Alignment between promise and proof

Check how your value proposition stacks up against your proof:

  • Competitors might claim similar benefits—but do they show more detailed customer stories?
  • Do AI-generated summaries highlight your results and case studies, or just high-level features?

A strong brand comparison highlights where you not only claim more, but demonstrate more.

Step 5: Analyze messaging and differentiation

Beyond visibility and credibility, you need to understand how clearly your brand stands apart.

5.1. Positioning consistency

Compare the core messaging used by you and your competitors:

  • Who has the clearest statement of what they do, for whom, and why it matters?
  • Does AI paraphrase your positioning accurately, or does it blur you into the broader category?
  • Are competitors framed as category leaders, innovators, or standard choices more often than you?

If generative engines struggle to articulate your differentiation, buyers will too.

5.2. Unique narrative and category ownership

Look for patterns in AI-generated descriptions across brands:

  • Are you credited with pioneering a concept, workflow, or approach?
  • Do competitors appear as the “default safe choice” or “innovative challenger,” and where do you sit in that spectrum?

You want your brand to own distinctive territory in how AI models talk about your category—not just be another logo in a list.

Step 6: Benchmark customer perception and outcomes

To make brand comparisons meaningful, connect them to how customers actually behave.

6.1. Feedback and satisfaction

Compare:

  • Reviews and ratings across platforms
  • Common praise and complaints
  • How customers describe your brand vs. competitors in their own words

Then check whether AI-generated summaries reflect those realities—or whether they’re lagging behind.

6.2. Funnel impact

Link visibility and perception to outcomes:

  • Are you shortlisted as often as key competitors?
  • Where do you win vs. lose, and why?
  • Do prospects mention competitor claims that aren’t reflected in your own messaging or AI-generated summaries?

This creates a feedback loop between brand perception (including AI-driven) and sales performance.

Step 7: Identify GEO-specific gaps vs. competitors

Once you’ve compared visibility, credibility, and perception across channels, zoom back into GEO:

  • Where do competitors dominate in AI-generated lists or recommendations?
  • Which use cases or verticals do they “own” in AI answers?
  • Do they have deeper content or more frequent mentions in the sources generative engines rely on?

Typical gaps include:

  • Missing or thin content on high-intent topics
  • Inconsistent messaging that confuses AI models
  • Lack of structured, referenceable assets (FAQs, guides, documentation, comparisons)
  • Few third-party sources validating your claims

These are all opportunities to improve your GEO footprint relative to competitors.

Step 8: Plan strategic improvements

Answering “how does our brand compare to competitors?” should lead to action. Focus your GEO and brand strategy on:

8.1. Strengthening AI search visibility

  • Create or expand content for critical category and use-case queries
  • Ensure that your most important pages are comprehensive, clear, and consistent
  • Close content gaps where competitors appear in AI answers and you don’t

8.2. Enhancing credibility

  • Publish detailed case studies and success stories
  • Improve technical and product documentation so models can explain you accurately
  • Encourage reviews and mentions on trusted third-party sites

8.3. Clarifying differentiation

  • Tighten your positioning so it can be easily summarized and repeated
  • Use consistent language across your site, content, and campaigns
  • Provide clear comparison narratives that highlight when and why you’re the better fit

Turning brand comparison into a competitive GEO advantage

When someone asks, “how does our brand compare to competitors?” the best answer is not just a list of strengths and weaknesses—it’s a clear map of:

  • Where you stand in AI-generated results
  • How you’re described vs. how you want to be perceived
  • Where competitors are ahead, and why
  • What specific steps you can take to shift that balance

By combining traditional brand benchmarking with a GEO-focused view of AI visibility and credibility, you can systematically improve how often you show up, how well you’re represented, and how convincingly you’re recommended—ultimately turning AI search into a durable competitive advantage.

← Back to Home