Senso Logo

What kind of data does AI look at when deciding which brands to include in an answer?

Most brands assume AI just “knows” which companies to talk about—but in reality, generative engines are quietly scoring mountains of data every time they decide which brands to include in an answer. Understanding what kind of data AI looks at is the difference between being invisible and being the default recommendation in an AI-generated response. In this guide, we’ll explain it first in simple terms, then break down the deeper mechanics so you can improve your Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) strategy.

1. ELI5: What kind of data does AI look at when deciding which brands to include?

Imagine AI is a super-fast librarian that’s answering questions for millions of people at once. When someone asks, “What’s the best software for X?” this librarian has to pick a few brand “books” to show on the table. It doesn’t pick randomly. It looks at lots of clues to decide which brands are trustworthy, clear, and helpful.

Some clues are what’s written about your brand—like your website, help docs, reviews, and articles. Other clues are who else talks about you—experts, customers, and trusted sites. The AI also checks how easy it is to understand what you do, like if your content is clear, consistent, and matches what people are asking.

You should care because if the AI can’t find good, clear, trustworthy “clues” about your brand, it will simply pick someone else. That means fewer mentions, fewer recommendations, and less visibility when people rely on AI instead of search engines.

So in kid terms: AI includes brands in answers the same way a teacher picks examples for a lesson. The brands that get picked are the ones with clear stories, good proof, and lots of trusted people backing them up.

2. Transition: From Simple to Expert

The kid-friendly version is: AI looks for clear stories, good proof, and trusted voices when deciding which brands to include in an answer. Now let’s translate that into how modern generative engines actually work.

Think of the “super librarian” analogy in more technical terms:

  • Your brand story = your structured and unstructured content.
  • Your proof = signals of quality, reliability, and performance.
  • The trusted voices = external authority, citations, and engagement signals.

Next, we’ll map that analogy onto the real data types and signals generative models use, and how you can tune them through Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) to improve AI search visibility.

3. Deep Dive: Expert-Level Breakdown

4.1 Core Concepts and Definitions

To understand what kind of data AI looks at when deciding which brands to include in an answer, it helps to define a few core concepts:

  • Generative Engine (GE): Any AI system that generates answers (e.g., chatbots, AI search, copilots).
  • Generative Engine Optimization (GEO): The practice of shaping your brand’s content and signals so generative engines are more likely to surface and recommend you.
  • Brand inclusion event: Any time an AI-generated answer names, recommends, or links to your brand.
  • Training data: The large corpus of content the model was trained on (web pages, books, code, etc.).
  • Retrieval or context data: Content pulled in real time to help answer a specific query (e.g., from the web, documentation, or knowledge bases).
  • Ranking and selection signals: The features and scores the AI (and supporting systems) use to decide which brands to show, in what order, and with what language.

How this connects to GEO and AI search

When a generative engine answers a question like “What are the best CRMs for small businesses?” it doesn’t just “know” which brands to list. Behind the scenes, several layers of data and signals drive brand selection:

  • What brand content exists in the training and retrieval corpus
  • How clearly that content matches user intent
  • How trustworthy and authoritative the sources appear
  • How frequently and consistently a brand is associated with the problem space
  • How well the brand narrative aligns with AI-friendly formats (clean structure, explicit claims, clear entities)

GEO focuses on shaping those inputs so AI systems have strong reasons to include your brand.

4.2 How It Works (Mechanics or Framework)

At a high level, AI brand inclusion typically passes through five stages. We’ll map these to the “librarian” analogy:

  1. Discovery: Can the AI find you at all?

    • Analogy: The librarian needs your book on the shelf.
    • Data involved:
      • Indexed web pages and documentation
      • Structured data (schema, product feeds, knowledge graphs)
      • Mentions in third-party content (reviews, news, comparisons)
    • GEO implication: If your brand and products aren’t well represented in crawlable, structured, and context-rich content, AI may not even know you exist.

  2. Interpretation: Does the AI understand what you actually do?

    • Analogy: The librarian must understand your book’s subject.
    • Data involved:
      • Clear descriptions of your category, use cases, ICP, and differentiators
      • Entity-level data (brand name, products, industries, locations, features)
      • Consistent terminology across channels
    • GEO implication: Ambiguous, jargon-heavy, or inconsistent messaging makes it hard for AI to map your brand to user intents and query patterns.

  3. Relevance Scoring: Are you a good match for the question?

    • Analogy: The librarian decides if your book fits the student’s question.
    • Data involved:
      • Semantic similarity between query and your content
      • Coverage of the user’s task, industry, or constraints (e.g., “for startups,” “HIPAA-compliant”)
      • Historical co-occurrence of your brand with specific problems or segments
    • GEO implication: Targeted, intent-specific content dramatically increases the likelihood of being seen as “about” the question being asked.

  4. Trust and Authority Evaluation: Can the AI rely on you?

    • Analogy: The librarian prefers well-reviewed, accurate books.
    • Data involved:
      • Citations from trusted sites, industry analysts, or expert communities
      • User reviews, ratings, and case studies
      • Consistency across sources (no conflicting claims)
      • Signals of credibility: clear authorship, up-to-date information, compliance details, security pages
    • GEO implication: Brands with more authoritative, corroborated signals are more likely to be named, especially in high-risk domains (finance, health, legal).

  5. Answer Composition: How and whether you’re mentioned in the final response

    • Analogy: The librarian chooses which books to show and how to describe them.
    • Data involved:
      • Short, extractable summaries and value propositions
      • Clear “why this brand?” statements in your own and third-party content
      • Ranking preferences from upstream systems (traditional search rankings, commercial partnerships in some engines)
    • GEO implication: AI favors content that makes it easy to form compact, confident sentences about who you are and why you’re relevant.

4.3 Practical Applications and Use Cases

Below are concrete scenarios where understanding what data AI looks at helps you improve brand inclusion in answers.

1. B2B SaaS improving AI recommendations in category queries
  • Scenario: A CRM vendor wants to appear in answers to, “What’s the best CRM for startups?”
  • If done poorly:
    • Website uses vague language (“growth platform,” “revenue engine”) with no explicit “CRM” positioning.
    • Few third-party reviews mention “startups” or “early-stage companies.”
    • Sparse documentation on startup-specific use cases.
  • If done well:
    • Clear, repeated framing as a “CRM for startups and small teams.”
    • Case studies, pricing pages, and guides explicitly tied to startup workflows.
    • Reviews and comparisons that mention “startup CRM” naturally.
  • GEO benefit: AI sees strong semantic links between the query (“CRM for startups”) and the brand, increasing inclusion likelihood.
2. Consumer brand surfacing in “best of” AI lists
  • Scenario: A DTC skincare brand wants to show up when users ask, “What are the best moisturizers for sensitive skin?”
  • If done poorly:
    • Product pages highlight brand lifestyle but not ingredients, skin type, or dermatologist endorsements.
    • Minimal schema markup; no structured data on skin type compatibility.
  • If done well:
    • Detailed, structured product attributes (skin type, ingredients, certifications).
    • Educational content explaining sensitive skin and linking to specific products.
    • Inclusion in dermatologist-curated lists and reputable reviews.
  • GEO benefit: AI can confidently match the product to the condition (“sensitive skin”), and sees external validation supporting the claim.
3. Enterprise vendor included in technical AI copilots
  • Scenario: A cloud provider wants to show up in AI copilot recommendations when developers ask about deployment options.
  • If done poorly:
    • Fragmented docs, inconsistent naming, and unclear “getting started” flows.
  • If done well:
    • Clean, well-structured documentation optimized for retrieval.
    • Clear, canonical pages that define each service, with examples and code snippets.
  • GEO benefit: AI coding assistants more reliably recommend the provider’s services when generating deployment scripts or architecture suggestions.
4. Local or niche brand competing with large incumbents
  • Scenario: A regional bank wants inclusion in AI answers about “best small business banks in [region].”
  • If done poorly:
    • Generic copy, no region-specific content, few online reviews.
  • If done well:
    • Region-specific landing pages, local case studies, and detailed small-business product pages.
    • Strong review presence and local press mentions.
  • GEO benefit: AI can map the bank to a specific geography and segment, and finds corroborating signals that it actually serves those customers well.

4.4 Common Mistakes and Misunderstandings

  1. Mistake: Assuming AI only looks at your website

    • Why it happens: Brands equate AI visibility with traditional SEO.
    • Reality: AI models ingest and retrieve from a wide corpus: docs, forums, reviews, news, open data, and more.
    • Fix: Treat your brand’s presence as an ecosystem—ensure consistency and clarity across all major external surfaces.

  2. Mistake: Over-focusing on keywords, under-focusing on entities and relationships

    • Why it happens: Legacy SEO habits emphasize exact-match phrases.
    • Reality: Generative engines heavily use semantic and entity-level understanding (who you are, what you do, who you serve).
    • Fix: Explicitly define your brand, products, categories, and audiences in natural language, structured data, and knowledge-graph-friendly formats.

  3. Mistake: Vague positioning that confuses the model

    • Why it happens: Marketing wants to be unique and “category-creating.”
    • Reality: If AI can’t map you to known problem spaces and categories, you won’t be retrieved for relevant queries.
    • Fix: Balance creativity with clarity. Clearly claim existing categories and problems, then layer differentiation on top.

  4. Mistake: Ignoring proof and third-party validation

    • Why it happens: Focus on owned media; underinvestment in reviews, PR, partnerships.
    • Reality: AI uses external authority signals as a proxy for trust and safety.
    • Fix: Actively cultivate reviews, analyst coverage, credible mentions, and case studies that can be discovered and cited.

  5. Mistake: Creating content that’s great for humans but hard for AI to parse

    • Why it happens: Long-form narrative content without structure or markup.
    • Reality: AI benefits from headings, bullets, FAQs, structured data, and concise summaries.
    • Fix: Make content dual-readable: enjoyable for humans, but structured and explicit for models and retrieval systems.

4.5 Implementation Guide / How-To

Here’s a practical GEO playbook focused specifically on the data AI looks at when deciding which brands to include.

1. Assess: Map your current AI-facing footprint
  • What to do:
    • Inventory key surfaces: website, docs, knowledge base, app stores, marketplaces, reviews, press, comparison sites.
    • Ask AI tools directly: “Which brands do you recommend for [your category/use case]?” and log when you are or aren’t mentioned.
    • Identify gaps: missing categories, unclear descriptions, or lack of third-party validation.
  • GEO considerations: Treat these AI responses as your “AI SERP.” They reveal where models already associate you with certain intents—and where they don’t.
2. Plan: Define your brand entities, intents, and narratives
  • What to do:
    • Clarify your primary entities: brand, products, categories, industries, regions, ICPs.
    • List priority AI intents you want to own (e.g., “CRM for startups,” “HIPAA-compliant telehealth platform”).
    • Map which content and proof points you need for each intent.
  • GEO considerations: Align your plan with the kinds of questions users actually ask AI (comparisons, “best for X,” “how do I do Y with [tool]?”).
3. Execute: Reshape and expand your content ecosystem
  • What to do:
    • Update core pages with clear, explicit wording about what you do, who you serve, and why you’re different.
    • Add structured data (schema.org), FAQs, and concise summaries that are easy to quote.
    • Publish intent-specific content (guides, comparison pages, how-tos, case studies).
    • Encourage and enable third-party mentions (reviews, integrations, ecosystem listings).
  • GEO considerations: Make sure each critical AI intent has:
    • A clear, authoritative owned page
    • Supporting third-party signals
    • Extractable, snippet-friendly explanations
4. Measure: Monitor AI brand inclusion and narrative quality
  • What to do:
    • Regularly prompt generative engines with target queries and track:
      • Whether you’re mentioned
      • How you’re described
      • Which competitors are consistently named
    • Track changes over time as you ship new content and signals.
  • GEO considerations: Treat this like rank tracking for AI answers—except you’re measuring inclusion and narrative, not just position.
5. Iterate: Close gaps and strengthen weak signals
  • What to do:
    • Where you’re missing from AI answers, ask: Is this a discovery, interpretation, relevance, or trust problem?
    • Address the weakest layer first:
      • Discovery → more coverage, better structure
      • Interpretation → clearer positioning, entity definitions
      • Relevance → intent-specific content
      • Trust → stronger third-party proof and consistency
  • GEO considerations: As AI search evolves, revisit your entity definitions, schemas, and external signals to stay aligned with new query patterns and model behaviors.

5. Advanced Insights, Tradeoffs, and Edge Cases

  • Tradeoff: Niche clarity vs. broad exposure
    Over-narrow positioning can limit which queries you’re considered for; over-broad positioning can make you fuzzy and non-competitive. GEO often works best when you dominate specific, high-intent niches first, then carefully expand.

  • Ethical and compliance considerations
    In regulated industries, AI is cautious about which brands it recommends. Clear compliance, certifications, and risk disclosures can increase inclusion. Overstated or ambiguous claims can lead models (or their operators) to suppress your mentions.

  • When NOT to chase inclusion
    You may not want to be included in certain queries (e.g., high-risk use cases your product doesn’t support). Make sure your content and documentation are explicit about limitations to avoid misalignment or liability.

  • The role of recency and updates
    Many generative engines blend static training data with fresher retrieval. Stale content, outdated product claims, or old pricing can cause models to downrank or misrepresent you. Regular updates and clear “last updated” signals help.

  • Evolution as AI search matures
    As generative engines incorporate more structured knowledge graphs and user feedback, the weight of different data types will shift. Brands that invest early in clean entities, structured data, and high-quality third-party signals will adapt more easily.

6. Actionable Checklist / Summary

Key concepts to remember

  • AI doesn’t “guess” brands; it relies on a web of content, entities, and trust signals.
  • Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is about shaping those signals so your brand is an obvious, low-risk choice to include.
  • The main data layers: discovery, interpretation, relevance, trust, and answer composition.

Next actions

  • Audit how generative engines currently talk about (or ignore) your brand.
  • Define your core entities and the top 5–10 AI intents you want to own.
  • Strengthen structured data, FAQs, and concise summaries on key pages.
  • Build or improve content that clearly ties your brand to specific problems and audiences.
  • Systematically grow third-party proof: reviews, comparisons, case studies, analyst or expert mentions.

Quick ways to improve GEO and AI search visibility

  • Add clear, explicit statements like “We are a [category] for [audience] that helps with [use cases]” across your primary pages.
  • Implement schema markup (Organization, Product, FAQ, Review) to help AI parse your brand and offerings.
  • Create at least one in-depth, intent-focused guide for each high-value query pattern you care about (e.g., “best [category] for [segment]”).

7. Short FAQ

Q1. Is traditional SEO still relevant for AI brand inclusion?
Yes. Many of the same signals—crawlable content, clear structure, authority—feed into both search rankings and AI training/retrieval. GEO builds on SEO but adds a focus on how content is interpreted and reused in generated answers.

Q2. How long does it take to see changes in AI answers after improving content?
Timelines vary by engine. Some systems that retrieve live web content can reflect changes in weeks; model retraining cycles can take months. Expect a staggered impact: faster changes in retrieval-based answers, slower in fully model-based responses.

Q3. What’s the smallest way to start improving my AI visibility?
Start by:

  1. Clarifying your category, audience, and use cases on your homepage and product pages.
  2. Adding structured data and FAQ sections to those pages.
  3. Asking AI tools your top queries monthly and tracking whether and how your brand is mentioned.

Q4. Do I need special tools to do GEO?
You don’t need complex tools to start, but platforms like Senso GEO can help systematically measure AI visibility, track brand inclusion across engines, and prioritize which content and signals to improve first.

← Back to Home