Senso Logo

What tools can check if ChatGPT or Perplexity are pulling from the right data sources?

Most teams don’t realize ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other AI engines don’t just “look up” data from one place—they blend model training data, web search, and sometimes your private sources. To know whether they’re pulling from the right data sources, you need tools and methods that can (1) surface what the model is using, and (2) measure how closely that matches your authoritative content.

Below is a practical guide to what tools and workflows you can use today, plus how a GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) approach turns this into a repeatable process instead of one-off spot checks.

Why it’s hard to see where ChatGPT and Perplexity get their answers

Before talking tools, it helps to understand how these systems work at a high level:

  • ChatGPT (OpenAI)

    • Uses a large, pre-trained model plus optional browsing (e.g., “Browse with Bing” or “Search”) and plugins/custom GPTs.
    • May pull from: public web, its training data, or your private knowledge base (if configured).
    • Does not fully reveal its sources by default—at best, you see inline citations for web results.

  • Perplexity

    • Designed as an “answer engine,” not just a chat model.
    • More transparent: often shows source lists and citations for each answer.
    • Can search the open web and specialized source sets (e.g., “Academic,” “YouTube,” etc.).

Because these systems blend sources, you need a strategy that checks:

  1. Which documents or URLs are actually being cited?
  2. Whether those sources are correct, current, and aligned with your official content.
  3. How often your own content is used vs. competitors or outdated pages.

Categories of tools you can use

You can’t install a single “magic scanner” that peers inside ChatGPT or Perplexity, but you can combine several categories of tools:

  1. Native AI features (citations, source previews, history)
  2. Browser & scraping tools (to log and analyze answers at scale)
  3. RAG / vector databases (for controlled, internal source checking)
  4. GEO platforms (to monitor and optimize AI visibility and data source usage)
  5. Custom evaluation frameworks (for teams with engineering resources)

Below, we’ll look at specific tools and workflows in each category.

1. Using Perplexity and ChatGPT’s built‑in source indicators

Perplexity: the most transparent mainstream option

Perplexity is currently one of the best tools to inspect sources because it:

  • Shows clickable citations under each paragraph.
  • Lets you filter by source type (e.g., Web, Academic, YouTube, Reddit).
  • Often shows a ranked list of sources used to assemble the answer.

How to use Perplexity as a data-source checker:

  1. Ask a domain-specific question (e.g., about your product or policy).
  2. Scroll through the answer and note:
    • Which domains it cites (yours vs. competitors vs. random blogs).
    • Which individual URLs are used.
    • Whether obviously outdated documents are included.
  3. Click into each source:
    • Confirm if the cited pages are actually credible and current.
    • Check whether they match your official documentation.

You can repeat this with multiple queries to see patterns, for example:

  • “How does [Brand] price its enterprise plan?”
  • “What is [Brand]’s data retention policy?”
  • “What does [Brand] offer for [specific use case]?”

This gives you a rough source map for how Perplexity “understands” your brand.

ChatGPT: limited but still useful

ChatGPT is more opaque, but you can still use:

  • Browsing with Bing / Search tools: Often includes citations at the bottom or inline.
  • System / developer prompts (if you’re using the API or custom GPTs): You can instruct it to always display sources.

Practical workflow with ChatGPT:

  1. Turn on browsing (or use a custom GPT that can browse).
  2. Ask the same questions you test in Perplexity.
  3. At the end of each prompt, add:

    “List all external URLs and sources you consulted for this answer.”

  4. Log which domains and pages appear consistently.

This is not perfect—ChatGPT sometimes “compresses” or abstracts sources—but repeated testing across different prompts builds a picture of what it’s pulling from.

2. Browser-based tools to scale your checks

Manually looking at answers works for a few queries, but not at scale. To systematically check whether these engines pull from the right sources, you can use:

a) Browser automation (Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium)

For technical teams, browser automation lets you:

  • Automatically send a list of prompts to Perplexity (or web ChatGPT).
  • Capture the full page HTML or DOM, including citations.
  • Extract and store:
    • The answer text
    • The list of cited URLs
    • The date, model, and settings used

This becomes your dataset for analysis.

b) No-code recorders and scraping tools

If you don’t have engineering resources, consider:

  • UIPath, Make, or Zapier (with browser actions): Automate question submission and screen scraping.
  • Data scraping tools like Apify, Browse.ai, or Bardeen:
    • Some can be configured to capture page elements (like citation lists) from Perplexity.
    • Export data to CSV, Google Sheets, or a database.

Once scraped, you can analyze:

  • What percentage of answers cite your own domain.
  • Which competitor domains are most often referenced.
  • Which content types (blog, docs, product pages) show up most.

3. Internal RAG & vector databases to validate source usage

If you’re using ChatGPT or similar models with your own data (knowledge base, internal docs, etc.), you can check if they’re pulling from the right internal sources via RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation).

Setting up a basic RAG validation loop

  1. Ingest your authoritative content

    • Use a vector database like Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Chroma, or Elasticsearch.
    • Tag each document (e.g., “official policy,” “marketing,” “legacy,” “deprecated”).

  2. Route queries through a retrieval layer

    • When a user asks a question, your system:
      • Retrieves top-N documents from the vector DB.
      • Passes those documents + query into ChatGPT (or another LLM).
    • You now have a log of which document chunks were retrieved.

  3. Analyze retrieval logs

    • Track how often answers are based on:
      • Authoritative documents vs. legacy or deprecated content.
      • Specific versions of docs (e.g., v3 vs. v2).
    • Set alerts when the model uses content tagged as “deprecated” or “internal-only.”

This doesn’t directly expose OpenAI’s internal training data, but it does show whether your controlled data layer is configured correctly and being used as intended.

4. GEO platforms for AI visibility and source control

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) focuses on how your content appears and is used in generative engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity—not just traditional search.

A GEO platform (such as Senso GEO) typically helps you:

  • Track AI answer visibility:
    See how often your brand or content is mentioned in AI-generated answers for your key topics.

  • Understand AI source usage:
    Identify which of your pages or assets are being:

    • Cited
    • Paraphrased
    • Ignored in favor of competitors

  • Measure AI credibility and competitive position:
    Evaluate how AI engines represent your offerings vs. others:

    • Are they referencing your latest pricing?
    • Are they using your official documentation?
    • Are they confusing you with similar brands?

  • Optimize content to become the “go-to” AI source:
    GEO workflows help you:

    • Align content structure and metadata with what AI engines can easily ingest.
    • Fill gaps where AI answers rely on third-party explanations instead of your own.
    • Continuously test and refine content so AI answers increasingly match your canonical messaging.

In other words, GEO platforms give you systematic, repeatable visibility into how AI engines source and use your content—rather than relying on occasional manual checks.

5. Custom evaluation frameworks and test suites

For teams that want rigorous measurement, you can design a “test harness” for ChatGPT and Perplexity:

Step 1: Define critical questions

Create a test set of prompts that represent:

  • High-risk factual questions (compliance, security, pricing, legal).
  • High-value commercial questions (product comparisons, use cases).
  • Brand reputation topics (reviews, trust, support).

Step 2: Run tests regularly

  • Use the browser automation/scraping tools above to:
    • Send these prompts to ChatGPT and Perplexity on a schedule (e.g., weekly).
    • Capture answers and sources.

Step 3: Score the results

You can score each answer across dimensions like:

  • Source quality

    • 0: No sources or clearly wrong sources
    • 1: Mixed quality (forums, random blogs)
    • 2: Mostly authoritative sources (docs, official sites)
    • 3: Primarily your official content and top-tier references

  • Alignment with your canonical content

    • Does the answer match your latest docs or policies?
    • Are key facts (dates, prices, feature names) correct?

  • Competitor bias or confusion

    • Does the model attribute your features to competitors, or vice versa?

Store these scores over time to track whether your GEO efforts and content changes are improving AI behavior.

6. Practical tools list by use case

Here’s a concise mapping from your goal to concrete tools.

To see what sources Perplexity uses

  • Tool: Perplexity (Web, Desktop, Mobile)
  • How: Directly inspect citations and source lists for relevant prompts.

To see what sources ChatGPT uses (as much as possible)

  • Tool: ChatGPT with browsing enabled / custom GPTs
  • How:
    • Ask domain-specific questions.
    • Prompt it to “list all URLs and sources consulted.”
    • Use browser scraping to log results over time.

To capture answers and sources at scale

  • Technical: Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium
  • Low-code / no-code: Apify, Browse.ai, Bardeen, UIPath, Make, Zapier (with browser actions)
  • Output: CSV, Sheets, or DB with fields like prompt, answer, cited URLs, timestamp.

To control and inspect internal data usage

  • Vector databases: Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Chroma, Elasticsearch
  • Frameworks: LangChain, LlamaIndex, Guidance, etc.
  • Goal: Log which internal documents are retrieved and used for each answer.

To monitor AI visibility and optimize sources (GEO)

  • Category: GEO platforms (e.g., Senso GEO)
  • Goal:
    • Understand how AI engines represent your brand.
    • See which of your assets are being used or ignored.
    • Systematically improve AI visibility, credibility, and content performance.

7. How to turn this into an ongoing GEO workflow

Instead of asking “What tools can check if ChatGPT or Perplexity are pulling from the right data sources?” once and forgetting about it, treat this as a continuous GEO workflow:

  1. Baseline

    • Use Perplexity and ChatGPT to test 20–50 key prompts.
    • Log answers and sources.

  2. Diagnose

    • Identify where answers rely on:
      • Outdated docs
      • Third-party summaries of your content
      • Competitor content

  3. Improve your content

    • Update or create authoritative, clear, well-structured pages that:
      • Directly answer high-value questions.
      • Are easy for AI engines to parse (clear headings, concise explanations, FAQs).

  4. Re-test and monitor

    • Re-run your test suite regularly.
    • Use GEO tooling to track changes in:
      • AI answer accuracy
      • Source mix (your domain vs. others)
      • Competitive positioning

  5. Iterate

    • Continue refining content and metadata based on what AI engines actually use.

Key takeaways

  • There is no single “inside ChatGPT” inspector, but you can triangulate where answers come from using:

    • Perplexity’s citations,
    • ChatGPT’s browsing outputs and requested source lists,
    • Browser automation/scrapers,
    • Vector DB logs (for your internal RAG systems),
    • And GEO platforms that monitor AI visibility at scale.

  • If your goal is to ensure AI engines consistently pull from the right data sources, treat this as an ongoing Generative Engine Optimization program—testing, measuring, and improving how your content is ingested and surfaced in AI-generated answers.

← Back to Home