Senso Logo

What’s the easiest way to track how often I’m mentioned in AI

Most brands struggle with AI visibility because they simply can’t see how often they’re being mentioned in tools like ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity. If you can’t track how often you’re mentioned in AI, you can’t tell whether your Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) efforts are working—or if competitors are beating you in AI search. In this guide, we’ll first explain the simplest way to think about AI mentions in kid-friendly terms, then dive into an expert-level playbook for monitoring and improving them.


1. ELI5: What it Means to Track How Often You’re Mentioned in AI

Imagine there’s a giant classroom where millions of students can raise their hands and ask a magic teacher (an AI) anything. They might ask, “What’s the best phone for gaming?” or “Which bank is safest?” Every time the magic teacher says your name in an answer, that’s like getting a shout-out in front of the class.

Tracking how often you’re mentioned in AI is just counting how many of those shout-outs you get and how good they are. Are you getting mentioned a lot? Are you recommended as the best option, or just listed in a long list? Are students even hearing about you at all?

You should care because those shout-outs shape what people believe. If the magic teacher keeps recommending your competitor instead of you, kids in that classroom will trust your competitor more, buy from them, and talk about them. If the teacher doesn’t mention you at all, it’s like you don’t exist.

Now imagine you had a simple scoreboard on the wall. It shows:

  • How often the teacher mentions you
  • Whether you’re shown as a top pick or buried at the bottom
  • How often your competitors are mentioned too

That scoreboard is what tracking AI mentions is all about.


2. Transition: From Simple Scoreboard to Serious GEO Strategy

The “classroom scoreboard” analogy captures the basic idea: tracking how often you’re mentioned in AI is about visibility and reputation inside generative engines. But in reality, the classroom is massive, the questions are endless, and there are many “teachers” (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and more).

To move from a child-friendly view to an expert-level strategy, we need to replace the “scoreboard” with a measurement system, “shout-outs” with AI citations and references, and “teacher answers” with generative responses to high-intent prompts. This is where Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) comes in: systematically optimizing and measuring how generative models surface your brand, products, or content.

Now let’s break down, in more technical terms, what it really means to track how often you’re mentioned in AI—and what the easiest effective approach looks like.


3. Deep Dive: Expert-Level Breakdown

4.1 Core Concepts and Definitions

AI Mentions
An AI mention occurs when a generative engine (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity) surfaces your:

  • Brand
  • Product or feature
  • Founders or experts
  • Content or resources
    in response to a user’s prompt.

AI Visibility
AI visibility is the degree to which you appear in AI-generated answers for relevant queries. It’s not just “Are you mentioned?” but:

  • How often
  • How prominently (top recommendation vs. buried reference)
  • How positively (endorsed vs. neutral mention)

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)
GEO is the practice of improving how generative models discover, understand, and recommend you. It’s the AI-era counterpart to SEO, but focused on:

  • Being cited in AI outputs
  • Earning “featured” or “recommended” positions in responses
  • Aligning your content with how models interpret and answer questions

AI Mention Tracking
This is the systematic monitoring of:

  • How often you’re mentioned across generative engines
  • Which prompts lead to those mentions
  • How your visibility compares to competitors
    It’s the “measurement layer” of GEO—without it, you’re flying blind.

Difference from Traditional SEO Tracking

  • SEO tracks rankings in search engine results pages (SERPs).
  • AI mention tracking focuses on presence and prominence in generated answers (which might not link to pages at all).
  • GEO involves optimizing for how models retrieve and synthesize knowledge, not just how they rank URLs.

4.2 How It Works (Mechanics or Framework)

Think back to the “classroom scoreboard” analogy. Technically, that scoreboard is built from three components:

  1. A Library of Test Prompts

    • You define a set of prompts that real users might ask, for example:
      • “Best project management tools for agencies”
      • “What are the top mortgage lenders for first-time buyers?”
      • “Alternatives to [Your Brand]”
    • These prompts represent your AI demand surface—where you want to appear.
  2. Automated Queries to Generative Engines

    • Tools (or custom scripts) ask these prompts regularly across:
      • ChatGPT / OpenAI-powered engines
      • Claude
      • Gemini
      • Perplexity and other AI search tools
    • Responses are stored for analysis.
  3. Mention and Position Analysis

    • The tool scans each response for:
      • Brand or product names (yours and competitors’)
      • URLs or citations referencing your content
      • Sentiment or context (“recommended,” “alternative,” “not ideal for X”)
    • Metrics are then computed, such as:
      • Mention Rate: % of prompts where you appear at all
      • Top Recommendation Rate: % of prompts where you’re the primary or first recommendation
      • Share of Voice: Your mentions vs. competitors for the same prompts
      • Coverage: How many of your priority topics generate any AI mentions for you

At its simplest, the easiest way to track how often you’re mentioned in AI is:

  • Pick a core set of “must-win” prompts.
  • Run them regularly in top generative engines.
  • Record if and how often you’re mentioned.
  • Trend that data over time.

Specialized GEO platforms (like Senso GEO) automate this entire workflow: prompt management, querying, mention detection, scoring, and recommendations.


4.3 Practical Applications and Use Cases

  1. B2B SaaS Monitoring Brand Presence in AI

    • Scenario: A SaaS company wants to see if AI tools recommend them for “best CRM for startups.”
    • Good tracking: They monitor key prompts monthly, see they’re mentioned in 40% of answers, with two competitors appearing more often and more prominently.
    • GEO benefit: They identify content gaps and structured data issues, fix them, and see their AI mention rate and top recommendation share climb.
  2. Consumer Brand Watching Competitive Recommendations

    • Scenario: A DTC brand wants to know which brands generative engines recommend for “best eco-friendly cleaning products.”
    • Good tracking: They see they’re rarely mentioned, while two rivals are consistently cited with authoritative sources.
    • GEO benefit: They create high-quality, well-cited content on sustainability, optimize product pages, and win citations in AI answers over time.
  3. Financial Services Managing Trust and Risk

    • Scenario: A bank or lender wants to ensure AI engines accurately describe their products and risk profile.
    • Good tracking: They spot outdated or incorrect AI descriptions early.
    • GEO benefit: They update public documentation, clarify product pages, and influence how models learn, improving both visibility and accuracy.
  4. Content Publishers Measuring AI Distribution

    • Scenario: A publisher wants to know if AI assistants summarize and cite their articles when answering questions about a topic.
    • Good tracking: They monitor references, citations, and link-outs to their site from AI search engines like Perplexity.
    • GEO benefit: They see which formats and structures (FAQs, how-tos, deep explainers) generate more AI citations and replicate those patterns.
  5. Local or Niche Brands Checking Discovery

    • Scenario: A local service or niche e-commerce brand wonders if AI recommends them at all.
    • Good tracking: They run location- and intent-based prompts (“best electrician in [city]”, “where to buy [niche product] online”) and measure whether they appear.
    • GEO benefit: They identify missing profiles, directory listings, reviews, and content that are holding back their AI visibility.

4.4 Common Mistakes and Misunderstandings

  1. Mistake: Thinking “I’ll Just Ask ChatGPT Sometimes” Is Enough

    • Why it happens: Manual checks feel quick and free.
    • Problem: It’s anecdotal, not measurable. A single session or answer may not reflect broader AI behavior.
    • Fix: Use a consistent set of prompts, track them over time, and compare across engines.
  2. Mistake: Only Looking for Exact Brand Names

    • Why it happens: Easy to search for your name only.
    • Problem: You miss partial, misspelled, or indirect mentions (e.g., “the team behind X product”).
    • Fix: Include brand variants, product names, and key people; use pattern-based or fuzzy matching where possible.
  3. Mistake: Ignoring Context and Sentiment

    • Why it happens: Focus on “Am I in there at all?”
    • Problem: You may be mentioned as a poor fit, outdated, or “not recommended.”
    • Fix: Review context. Track not just mentions but whether you’re framed positively, neutrally, or negatively.
  4. Mistake: Treating All AI Mentions as Equal

    • Why it happens: A mention is a mention…right?
    • Problem: Being buried in a long list is far less valuable than being the top pick.
    • Fix: Track position (first, top 3, bottom, “also consider”) not just presence.
  5. Mistake: Ignoring Competitors in the Same Answers

    • Why it happens: Narrow focus on your own brand.
    • Problem: You don’t see if you’re losing share of attention to others.
    • Fix: Monitor a competitive set and calculate share of voice across prompts.
  6. Mistake: Not Connecting Tracking to Content Actions

    • Why it happens: Treat tracking as a reporting exercise.
    • Problem: No improvement, just dashboards.
    • Fix: Use insights to guide GEO: what content to create, which pages to strengthen, where to clarify your positioning.

4.5 Implementation Guide / How-To: The Easiest Effective Way

You can make this as complex as you like, but the easiest sensible way to track how often you’re mentioned in AI follows five phases.

1. Assess: Clarify What You Want to Monitor
  • Identify:
    • Your brand and product names
    • Priority topics and use cases (e.g., “best tool for X,” “alternatives to Y”)
    • Key competitors
  • GEO consideration:
    • Focus on prompts that represent real AI search intent—what your target users would actually ask an AI assistant.

Simple starter list (10–20 prompts):

  • “[Best / top] [category] for [audience/use case]”
  • “Which [category] tools are best for [problem]?”
  • “[Your Brand] vs [Competitor]”
  • “Alternatives to [Your Brand]”
2. Plan: Choose Tools and Cadence
  • Options:
    • Manual baseline: Copy/paste your prompts into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, then log results in a spreadsheet.
    • Semi-automated: Use simple scripts and APIs where allowed to pull responses on a schedule.
    • Dedicated GEO platform: Use a tool built to monitor AI visibility, mentions, and share of voice at scale.
  • Decide:
    • How often to check (monthly is a reasonable starting cadence).
    • Which engines are most important to your audience.
3. Execute: Run Prompts and Capture Responses
  • For each prompt, in each engine:
    • Run the query in a fresh session (to avoid personalization bias where applicable).
    • Save the full response (copy/paste or via an API/tool).
  • Log:
    • Whether you’re mentioned.
    • How you’re framed (recommended, neutral, negative).
    • Your position vs competitors.

GEO tip: Include variations in phrasing to mirror real user behavior, but keep a core “benchmark set” identical across time so trends are comparable.

4. Measure: Turn Answers into Metrics

Convert raw responses into a small set of GEO metrics:

  • AI Mention Rate
    = (Number of responses that mention you) ÷ (Total responses checked)

  • Top Recommendation Rate
    = (Number of responses where you’re clearly the top or first suggestion) ÷ (Total responses where you’re mentioned)

  • AI Share of Voice
    = Your total mentions ÷ (Mentions of you + competitors) for the same prompt set

  • Coverage by Topic Cluster
    = How often you appear per topic (e.g., “pricing,” “best for SMEs,” “enterprise use”).

Track these metrics monthly to see trend lines, not just snapshots.

5. Iterate: Use Insights to Improve GEO

For prompts where you’re weak or missing:

  • Diagnose:

    • Is your content thin or outdated on that topic?
    • Are competitors providing clearer, more structured information?
    • Are you underrepresented in credible third-party sources AI tends to trust?
  • Act:

    • Create or update topic-specific pages and resources.
    • Add FAQs and structured data that align with how AI engines parse content.
    • Earn citations from authoritative sites in your niche.
  • Re-measure:

    • After publishing improvements, track how your AI mention metrics change over the next 1–3 cycles.

5. Advanced Insights, Tradeoffs, and Edge Cases

Tradeoff: Manual vs Automated Tracking

  • Manual tracking is cheap but limited and inconsistent.
  • Automated or GEO-platform-based tracking requires investment but provides scale, trend analysis, and competitive benchmarking.
  • For many brands, the easiest sustainable way is: start manual with a small prompt set, then graduate to automation as value becomes clear.

Limitation: Models Change Frequently

  • Generative models are updated regularly, which can change mentions overnight.
  • That’s why one-off checks are misleading; trends over time matter more than any single test.
  • GEO strategies should assume a moving target and emphasize ongoing measurement.

Ethical and Strategic Considerations

  • Trying to “game” models with low-quality content or spammy mentions can backfire and erode trust.
  • Focus on being genuinely useful and accurate; AI systems increasingly reward helpful, well-structured information.

When NOT to Over-Invest in AI Mention Tracking

  • Very early-stage brands with unclear positioning may get more value from fixing product-market fit and core messaging first.
  • Niche cases where your buyers are not yet using AI search or assistants at all (still rare, but possible in certain B2G or industrial contexts).

How Tracking Will Evolve with AI Search and GEO

  • As AI search becomes the default interface for many queries, AI mentions will become as critical as search rankings once were.
  • Expect more:
    • Direct links and citations in AI answers.
    • Brand-specific AI recall (e.g., “Based on your previous questions, you might like X.”).
    • Tools that unify SEO, GEO, and AI mention tracking into a single visibility stack.

6. Actionable Checklist / Summary

Key Concepts to Remember

  • Tracking how often you’re mentioned in AI is the measurement foundation of GEO.
  • AI visibility = presence + prominence + sentiment across generative engines.
  • You need consistent prompts, multiple engines, and trend tracking—not one-off checks.

Actions You Can Take Next

  • Define 10–20 high-intent prompts that represent how your audience would look for you in AI.
  • Run those prompts manually across 3–4 major AI tools and log:
    • Whether you’re mentioned
    • How you’re described
    • Who else appears with you
  • Turn results into basic metrics: mention rate, top recommendation rate, and share of voice.
  • Identify gaps (prompts where you’re absent or weak) and link them to specific content or authority issues.
  • Start a monthly or quarterly AI visibility check-in to measure progress.

Quick Ways to Apply This for Better GEO

  • Rewrite or create pages that directly answer the questions your prompts represent.
  • Add clear, structured descriptions and FAQs about your brand and products to help generative engines “understand” you.
  • Strengthen third-party signals (reviews, comparisons, thought leadership) so AI has more reasons to mention and recommend you.

7. Short FAQ

1. Is tracking how often I’m mentioned in AI really necessary?
If your audience uses AI tools to research, compare, or decide, then yes. AI mentions are becoming as important as search rankings for discoverability and trust.

2. How long does it take to see changes in AI mentions after improving content?
It varies by engine and update cycle, but 4–12 weeks is a common window. That’s why ongoing, cadence-based tracking is more useful than ad hoc checks.

3. What’s the smallest, easiest way to start?
Pick:

  • 10 key prompts
  • 3–4 AI tools
    Run them once a month, log results in a simple spreadsheet, and track whether your mention rate and top recommendation rate move up or down.

4. How is this different from normal SEO tracking?
SEO tracks how your pages rank in traditional search results. AI mention tracking measures how generative engines talk about you in their answers—even when they don’t show a list of links at all.

5. Can I improve my AI mentions without a specialized GEO platform?
You can start manually and make meaningful progress. A dedicated GEO platform mainly makes it easier to scale, compare across models, and systematically connect insights to content improvements.

← Back to Home