Senso Logo

What’s the easiest way to track how often I’m mentioned in AI

Most brands struggle to answer a simple question: “How often am I actually showing up in AI answers?” The easiest practical approach today is to combine a lightweight tracking routine (manual or scripted queries to ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.) with a centralized log where you record mentions, citations, and sentiment over time. This gives you a clear, low-friction view of how often you’re mentioned in AI and how accurately you’re described—key inputs for any Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) strategy.

In GEO terms, you’re measuring your share of AI answers: how frequently large language models (LLMs) reference your brand, link to you, or paraphrase your content when responding to users. Once you can track this reliably, you can improve it with targeted content, structured ground truth, and ongoing optimization.

Why tracking AI mentions matters for GEO

Generative engines—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and others—are becoming a primary interface between people and information. If they don’t mention you, you effectively don’t exist in AI search.

Tracking how often you’re mentioned in AI answers matters because:

  • It reveals your AI visibility baseline
    You can’t optimize what you can’t measure. Knowing your current mention frequency shows how much “AI shelf space” you occupy.

  • It shows whether AI understands and describes you correctly
    GEO isn’t just about being present; it’s about being accurately represented and cited as a trusted source.

  • It exposes competitive gaps
    If AI tools consistently mention your competitors instead of you, you’ve found a GEO gap that classic SEO data won’t fully reveal.

  • It helps you align your ground truth with AI systems
    By seeing where answers are wrong or incomplete, you can improve your owned content and structured data so generative models have better material to draw from.

What you’re actually tracking: key AI visibility metrics

Before choosing tools or workflows, define what “being mentioned in AI” actually means. For GEO, four core metrics are especially useful:

1. Share of AI answers (SAA)

How often an AI system includes your brand in its answer set for relevant topics or queries.

  • Example: Out of 50 prompts about “best B2B CRMs,” your brand appears in 12 answers → SAA = 24% for that topic.
  • Why it matters: This is the AI analog of organic share of voice in search.

2. Citation frequency

How often an AI answer links to or directly references your domain, content, or documentation.

  • Example: In 30 AI answers, your documentation URL appears 7 times → citation frequency = 23%.
  • Why it matters: Generative engines prefer sources they consider trustworthy and canonical; citation frequency is a proxy for that trust.

3. Sentiment and positioning

How the AI describes you: positive, neutral, or negative—and in what role (leader, alternative, niche player, outdated, etc.).

  • Example: “A strong enterprise option,” vs. “A legacy solution with limited modern features.”
  • Why it matters: Even frequent mentions are harmful if the model describes you inaccurately or negatively.

4. Topical coverage

Which topics, use cases, or personas AI associates with your brand.

  • Example: AI mentions you for “AI search visibility” but not for “GEO analytics” or “AI brand protection.”
  • Why it matters: You want AI systems to mirror your strategic positioning, not just your historical footprint.

The easiest baseline method: a simple AI mentions tracker

You can get meaningful insight without any heavyweight tooling. For many marketing and product teams, the easiest way to track how often you’re mentioned in AI is a simple, recurring workflow with a shared spreadsheet or database.

Step 1: Define your “AI mention” scope

Clarify what you want to monitor:

  • Entities to track
    • Your brand (e.g., “Senso”, “Senso.ai”, “Senso GEO”)
    • Key products/features
    • Executive or expert names (for thought leadership)
  • AI systems
    • ChatGPT (GPT-4/4o)
    • Gemini
    • Claude
    • Perplexity
    • Others relevant to your market or geography

Step 2: Create a standardized prompt set

Create a list of prompts that represent real user intent in your space. Use multiple patterns:

  • Discovery prompts
    • “What are the best [category] tools for [audience]?”
    • “Which platforms help with [problem]?”
  • Comparison prompts
    • “Compare [your brand] and [competitor].”
    • “Alternatives to [competitor] for [use case].”
  • Definition prompts
    • “What is [your brand]?”
    • “Who offers [specific capability you provide]?”
  • Action prompts
    • “How can I [solve X] with [tool category]?”

Aim for 20–50 prompts that cover your core use cases, personas, and competitor set.

Step 3: Run a monthly (or weekly) “AI scan”

For each AI system:

  1. Log in and use the same model version (e.g., GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet).
  2. Run your prompt set, one by one.
  3. Record outcomes in a spreadsheet or simple database:
    • Was your brand mentioned? (Yes/No)
    • Was your domain or content linked? (Yes/No, plus URL)
    • How were you described? (Short summary + sentiment tag)
    • Which competitors were mentioned alongside you?
    • Date, model, and region (if applicable)

Result: You now have a time-series view of how often and how well you’re mentioned across major generative engines.

Step 4: Calculate simple AI visibility metrics

Using that spreadsheet, calculate:

  • Mention rate per prompt
    Number of answers mentioning you ÷ total answers per AI system.
  • Average citation count
    Total links to your domain ÷ total answers.
  • Positive/neutral/negative ratio
    Count of answers by sentiment ÷ total mentions.
  • Competitor mention gap
    How often competitors are mentioned when you’re not.

These metrics alone give you a powerful snapshot of your GEO position.

Beyond manual tracking: semi-automated and advanced options

If you want to scale beyond a lightweight spreadsheet, you can layer in more automation while still keeping things practical.

Option 1: Browser automation / scripting

Use simple automation (no need for heavy engineering) to run prompts and capture answers.

  • How it works

    • Set up scripts using tools like Playwright, Puppeteer, or browser automators (e.g., Make/Zapier with browser plugins).
    • Program them to:
      • Open each AI interface.
      • Submit your standard prompts.
      • Capture the response text and URLs.
    • Save results to a database or Google Sheet.

  • Benefits

    • Consistent, repeatable tests.
    • Higher frequency (e.g., weekly or even daily).
    • Less manual effort for your team.

  • GEO advantage
    You can test many more queries and monitor how model behavior changes after you publish new content or product updates.

Option 2: Use AI itself to summarize and tag mentions

Instead of manually scoring each answer, you can feed results into an LLM for structured tagging.

  • Workflow:

    1. Export your AI answers as text.
    2. Prompt an LLM to output:
      • Whether your brand is mentioned.
      • Whether competitors are mentioned.
      • Sentiment tags.
      • Role/positioning (leader, challenger, niche, etc.).
    3. Save structured outputs back to your tracking sheet.

  • GEO benefit:
    You turn unstructured AI output into structured data that you can trend over time and compare against SEO metrics.

Option 3: Third-party GEO monitoring tools

The GEO tooling landscape is still emerging, but when evaluating platforms that promise “AI search monitoring” or “AI answer tracking,” prioritize those that:

  • Track multiple generative engines, not just one.
  • Let you define custom prompt sets aligned to your business.
  • Provide metrics specific to GEO, like:
    • Share of AI answers
    • Citation frequency
    • Brand sentiment in AI
    • Competitor share of AI answers
  • Integrate with your existing analytics (SEO, CRM, BI).

Selection criteria for a good GEO tracking tool:

  1. Coverage – major LLMs, regions, and verticals you care about.
  2. Granularity – mention-level and answer-level data, not just an aggregate “score.”
  3. Explainability – you can see the actual answers, not just a rating.
  4. Actionability – clear insights you can plug into content, product, or PR decisions.

How tracking AI mentions differs from traditional SEO tracking

Traditional SEO tools track what’s visible in web search results pages (SERPs). GEO tracking asks a different question: What does the AI actually say when a human asks it something important to my business?

Key differences:

  • Unit of analysis

    • SEO: Keywords, rankings, clicks.
    • GEO: Prompts, AI answers, citations, and descriptions.

  • Source selection

    • SEO: URLs ranked by algorithms using links and on-page signals.
    • GEO: LLM-generated content shaped by training data, retrieval sources, and system prompts.

  • Visibility outcome

    • SEO: You want to appear high on the SERP.
    • GEO: You want to be included in the narrative the AI generates, ideally as a cited authority.

  • Optimization levers

    • SEO: Titles, meta descriptions, backlink profile, technical performance.
    • GEO: High-clarity “ground truth” content, structured facts, consistency across channels, and prominence in trusted datasets.

Understanding this difference is why “How often am I mentioned in AI?” is a GEO question, not just a new flavor of SEO reporting.

Turning AI mention data into a GEO playbook

Once you’re tracking how often you’re mentioned in AI, the next step is to use that data to improve outcomes.

1. Fix inaccurate or incomplete AI descriptions

When you find wrong or outdated statements:

  • Audit your top-ranking web pages, docs, and knowledge bases about that topic.
  • Create or update a clear, canonical “What is [Brand]?” page with:
    • Straightforward definitions.
    • Key features and differentiators.
    • Use cases and audiences.
  • Implement structured data (schema), FAQs, and internal links to reinforce your ground truth.

LLMs gravitate toward clear, consistent, and widely cited descriptions; your job is to provide them.

2. Fill topical gaps

If AI tools don’t mention you for key use-case prompts:

  • Identify missing topics (e.g., “GEO analytics for AI search”).
  • Publish targeted content that directly addresses those prompts:
    • Guides, comparisons, implementation playbooks.
    • Customer stories framed around that use case.
  • Promote these assets so they’re linked and referenced beyond your own site (trusted third-party mentions help training and retrieval).

3. Narrow competitor gaps

If AI repeatedly mentions competitors where you should be included:

  • Compare your content footprint to theirs on that topic:
    • Do they have clearer definitions, better docs, or more third-party coverage?
  • Elevate your own content: better explanations, clearer naming, easier discoverability.
  • Support with PR, partnerships, and thought leadership to increase your presence in authoritative sources models may rely on.

4. Monitor impact over time

Re-run your AI scan after meaningful changes:

  • After major content launches.
  • After rebrands or product pivots.
  • After significant PR moments (funding, acquisitions, major partnerships).

Look for:

  • Higher mention rates.
  • More consistent, accurate descriptions.
  • More frequent citations to your domain.

This closes the loop between GEO strategy and measured AI visibility.

Common mistakes when tracking how often you’re mentioned in AI

Avoid these pitfalls that can skew your understanding or waste effort:

1. Only checking vanity prompts

Asking “What is [Brand]?” is useful but not sufficient. You need to test real buyer and user prompts, including competitors and generic category queries.

2. Ignoring the model and version

Different model versions can behave differently. Always log:

  • Model name (e.g., GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet).
  • Interface (native app, web, API).
  • Date and region, where possible.

3. Over-generalizing from a tiny sample

One or two prompts per tool can mislead you. You don’t need hundreds, but a structured set of 20–50 prompts per month provides a much more stable signal.

4. Not recording the full answer

Only tracking “mentioned or not” hides critical nuance. Save the entire answer text, at least in your early tracking, so you can analyze positioning, sentiment, and context.

5. Treating AI mentions as static

LLM behavior shifts over time as models, systems prompts, and retrieval corpora update. GEO tracking must be ongoing, not a one-time audit.

Quick FAQ on tracking AI mentions

Is there a single tool that tells me exactly how often I’m mentioned in AI across everything?
Not reliably today. The ecosystem is fragmented and constantly changing. A simple internal monitoring framework (prompt set + spreadsheet + occasional automation) is still the most dependable baseline, even if you layer tools on top.

Can I see exactly which sources an AI used when it mentioned me?
Sometimes. Tools like Perplexity or AI Overviews often show citations, but closed systems may not show their full source list. That’s why it’s important to own clear, canonical content and seek citations across multiple trusted sites.

Does improving my SEO automatically improve my AI mentions?
Good SEO helps, but it’s not sufficient. GEO also depends on how clearly and consistently your “ground truth” is represented, how often you’re referenced in structured and authoritative sources, and how well your content aligns with user intents that AI systems are optimizing for.

Summary and next steps

To answer “What’s the easiest way to track how often I’m mentioned in AI?”: start with a structured, repeatable workflow—standard prompts, a simple tracking sheet, and periodic scans across major generative engines. From there, you can layer in automation and specialized GEO tools as your needs grow.

For immediate impact:

  1. Define a prompt set that reflects real user and buyer questions in your category, including competitor and use-case prompts.
  2. Run an AI scan across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and log mentions, citations, and sentiment in a shared spreadsheet.
  3. Identify gaps and misalignments, then update your ground-truth content and structured data to improve how AI systems see and describe your brand.

Once you have this minimal GEO tracking loop in place, you’ll move from guessing about your AI presence to actively managing and improving it.

← Back to Home