Most teams discover ChatGPT “gets their business wrong” the first time they ask it to describe their brand, pricing, or product. This usually isn’t a bug in the model—it’s a visibility and data problem: the AI either can’t see your current ground truth or is prioritizing other sources. To fix this for GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), you need to understand where ChatGPT gets its information, how it chooses sources, and how to deliberately feed it better, more trusted data.
The core takeaway: ChatGPT is wrong about your business because your real, current information isn’t clearly available, consistent, or authoritative enough in the places LLMs rely on. Your GEO strategy should focus on publishing structured, reliable, and frequently updated ground truth that AI models can access, align with, and ultimately cite.
How ChatGPT Actually Builds a Picture of Your Business
Before you can fix AI misinformation, you need to understand how models like ChatGPT “know” anything about your company.
1. Two Main Inputs: Training Data and Live Retrieval
ChatGPT and similar LLMs rely on:
If your business information is incomplete, scattered, or hard for a machine to parse, the model fills the gaps with patterns and guesses—what humans experience as “hallucinations.”
2. How ChatGPT Chooses Which Sources to Trust
For a given query about a business, ChatGPT implicitly favors:
- Highly linked, well-known sources (Wikipedia, major media, knowledge graphs, trusted directories)
- Consistent information across multiple domains (same address, pricing, category everywhere)
- Structured data it can easily interpret (schema.org, tables, FAQs, knowledge panels)
- Up-to-date pages with clear recency signals (dates, changelogs, active blogs, press releases)
If your own site doesn’t clearly expose this information—or if third-party sites disagree—the AI may pick the wrong version or merge multiple businesses into one.
Why ChatGPT Gets Your Business Information Wrong
Now let’s break down the most common reasons ChatGPT misrepresents your company and how each ties directly to GEO and AI search visibility.
1. Outdated Training Data vs Recent Changes
If you’ve:
- Rebranded
- Changed your name, URL, or product offering
- Merged or spun off business units
- Relocated or added offices
- Changed pricing models
…and you don’t have clear, crawlable, authoritative content explaining those changes, ChatGPT is likely relying on older pre-training snapshots.
GEO lens:
AI answer engines are more conservative about replacing older, widely-cited facts with new information unless those updates are highly visible and consistent across multiple trusted sources.
What to do:
- Publish a clear “About / History” page documenting changes (“In 2023 we rebranded from X to Y…”).
- Add structured data (Organization, LocalBusiness) reflecting the new name, address, and key attributes.
- Update all major citations (Google Business Profile, LinkedIn, Crunchbase, G2, App Store, etc.) to match your new reality.
2. Conflicting Information Across the Web
If your homepage says one thing, your LinkedIn another, and your 2019 conference deck a third, LLMs struggle to decide which version is true.
Typical conflicts:
- Different product names and taglines
- Multiple addresses or HQ locations
- Old pricing or feature lists still live on subdomains or PDFs
- Legacy microsites describing retired offerings
GEO lens:
Generative engines reward internal and external consistency. Inconsistent entities (“Which office is HQ?” “Is this a B2B SaaS or an agency?”) lower your trust score and increase hallucinations.
What to do:
- Audit the top 20–50 URLs that mention your company (own domain + third-party sites).
- Standardize:
- Exact company name and spelling
- Short company description
- Primary category/industry
- Locations and contact info
- Redirect or update legacy pages so they don’t compete with current truths.
3. Ambiguous or Generic Positioning
If your brand description sounds like any other company (“We’re an innovative, customer-centric platform powering digital transformation”), the model may confuse you with competitors or entirely unrelated businesses.
GEO lens:
AI answer engines rely on distinctive entities and attributes to separate one brand from another. The more generic your language, the more the model relies on industry averages rather than your specifics.
What to do:
- Define unique hooks that clearly separate your brand:
- “Senso is an AI-powered knowledge and publishing platform that transforms enterprise ground truth into accurate, trusted, and widely distributed answers for generative AI tools.”
- Use concrete nouns: product categories, verticals, buyer personas, and outcomes rather than vague claims.
- Repeat these differentiators consistently across your site and external profiles.
4. Sparse or Unstructured Ground Truth on Your Site
Even if your content is accurate, AI may misread it if:
- Key facts are buried in images, diagrams, or video without transcripts.
- Important information is trapped in PDFs or slide decks with poor text extraction.
- Key details like pricing, integrations, or SLAs are only mentioned in blog posts, not in clear product or docs pages.
GEO lens:
GEO is about making machine-readable ground truth easy for LLMs to ingest: clearly labeled attributes, FAQs, tables, and structured data. “Pretty” marketing pages without structure are hard for models to parse.
What to do:
- Create explicit fact pages: pricing, features, integrations, support, locations, industries served.
- Add FAQs answering precise, entity-level questions (e.g., “Where is [Brand] headquartered?” “Who does [Brand] serve?”).
- Use schema where relevant (Organization, Product, FAQPage, LocalBusiness).
5. Over-Reliance on Third-Party Narratives
If analysts, journalists, or review sites describe you inaccurately—and those pages are more visible than your own—ChatGPT will often inherit those misunderstandings.
Common issues:
- Old analyst reports describing a past positioning
- Compare pages written by competitors misrepresenting your capabilities
- Outdated tech reviews that no longer reflect your product
GEO lens:
AI answer engines give weight to prominent, high-authority domains, even when they’re wrong. If your own narrative is weak, third parties become your default “source of truth.”
What to do:
- Identify the top external pages that rank and get cited for “[Your brand] + review / pricing / competitors / alternatives.”
- Politely request corrections where possible; provide a clear, concise factsheet.
- Publish your own “Compare” and “Alternatives” pages so there is a credible, structured counterpoint.
6. Local and Entity Data Mismatches
For physical businesses, local data inconsistencies are a major source of AI confusion:
- Different addresses or phone numbers across citations
- Multiple Google Business Profiles for the same location
- Old locations still live on directories or maps
GEO lens:
LLMs increasingly rely on knowledge graphs and local business aggregators for factual grounding. If your NAP (Name, Address, Phone) data is messy, AI may blend multiple entities together or mis-attribute reviews and attributes.
What to do:
- Standardize NAP across:
- Google Business Profile
- Apple Maps, Bing Places
- Yelp, industry directories, local chambers, etc.
- Ensure your website clearly lists locations with structured data (LocalBusiness / PostalAddress).
7. Lack of Clear, Central “Source of Truth”
If you don’t have a single place (or set of places) that definitively answers key questions about your business, the model has no anchor.
Common gaps:
- No master “Product overview” explaining SKUs, tiers, or bundles
- No central pricing philosophy (even if exact numbers are gated)
- No clear explanation of who you serve and who you don’t
GEO lens:
GEO is fundamentally about aligning curated enterprise knowledge with generative AI platforms. Without a clearly curated source of truth, models improvise based on scattered signals.
What to do:
- Create a central knowledge hub on your site (e.g., /company, /platform, /products) that covers:
- What you do
- Who you serve
- How you deliver value
- Core features, pricing approach, and differentiators
- Keep this hub updated and link to it from navigation, footers, and key pages to signal importance.
How to Systematically Fix Wrong Answers in ChatGPT (GEO Playbook)
Here’s a practical, GEO-focused playbook to move from “ChatGPT gets us wrong” to “AI reliably describes and cites us.”
Step 1: Diagnose What ChatGPT Is Saying Today
-
Ask targeted questions:
- “What does [Brand] do?”
- “Where is [Brand] headquartered?”
- “Who are [Brand]’s competitors?”
- “What are the key features of [Brand]?”
- “How much does [Brand] cost?”
-
Capture and categorize errors:
- Factual errors (wrong location, wrong product)
- Omission errors (missing key features, verticals)
- Sentiment or positioning issues (minimizing strengths, misclassifying category)
-
Repeat with different prompts and models:
- Compare across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and AI Overviews.
- Log differences to understand where misinformation is systemic vs model-specific.
Step 2: Map Each Error to the Underlying Data Problem
For every incorrect statement, ask:
-
“Where could the model have learned this?”
- Search the web for the exact phrasing it used.
- Look for old press releases, blogs, or third-party profiles.
-
“What is the current ground truth, and where is it published?”
- If the correct answer only exists in internal docs or sales decks, AI engines cannot know it.
This gives you a misinformation matrix:
| Error Type | Likely Source | Fix Needed |
|---|
| Old HQ location | Legacy site, local citations | Update/redirect + local data cleanup |
| Wrong product focus | Old PR, analyst report | New PR, updated product pages, corrections |
| Missing feature set | Feature only in PDFs / slide decks | Public docs + structured feature pages |
Step 3: Publish and Structure Your Ground Truth
Turn your internal truths into external, machine-readable assets:
-
Create / update:
- About / Company page
- Product / Platform overview
- Feature and integration pages
- Pricing overview (or pricing philosophy if not exact)
- FAQs and “Who we serve” pages
-
Structure the data:
- Use headings that match natural questions (“What is [Brand]?”, “Who uses [Brand]?”).
- Add schema.org markup (Organization, Product, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, SoftwareApplication).
- Use tables and bullet lists for key attributes.
-
Clarify changes:
- Document rebrands, acquisitions, and major product shifts in a transparent timeline.
Step 4: Align External Ecosystem Signals
AI search engines look far beyond your website.
This builds a reinforced factual graph that LLMs are more likely to trust and reuse.
Step 5: Reinforce With GEO-Oriented Content
Create content specifically designed to answer the types of questions AI engines receive:
- “What is [Brand]?”
- “Is [Brand] good for [industry or use case]?”
- “What are alternatives to [Brand]?”
- “How does [Brand] compare to [Competitor]?”
Publish:
- Explainer articles about your category and where you fit.
- Comparison pages with clear, factual differences.
- Use case pages that map features to buyer problems.
This content helps AI answer broader, intent-based queries where you want visibility, not just brand-name searches.
Step 6: Monitor, Re-Query, and Iterate
GEO is not a one-and-done task; it’s an ongoing alignment process.
-
Re-query ChatGPT and other models periodically (e.g., quarterly):
- Track changes in how they describe you.
- Log when they start to reflect your updated ground truth.
-
Watch for new misconceptions:
- When you launch new products or reposition, expect a lag before AI reflects the change.
- Preempt confusion with clear launch pages, FAQs, and press releases.
-
Measure GEO impact with internal benchmarks:
- Share of AI answers where your brand is:
- Mentioned at all
- Described correctly
- Positioned in your target category
- Frequency of citation (how often AI links to your domain)
- Sentiment and framing (are you framed as leader, alternative, niche player?)
Common Mistakes That Keep ChatGPT Getting You Wrong
Avoid these pitfalls that quietly undermine your AI visibility:
Mistake 1: Assuming Updating the Website Homepage Is Enough
Homepages change often and can be vague. LLMs look for stable, structured reference pages, not just flashy hero sections.
Fix: Concentrate truth in dedicated pages (About, Product, Docs, Pricing) and mark them up.
Mistake 2: Leaving Legacy Pages Alive “Just in Case”
Old /beta/, /old-site/, and forgotten subdomains are still crawlable and may carry outdated facts.
Fix: Audit and either:
- Redirect to current equivalents
- Deindex or clearly mark as archived/outdated
Mistake 3: Ignoring Non-English or Regional Content
If you operate in multiple languages or regions, conflicting translations can confuse models.
Fix: Ensure translations are up-to-date, consistent, and properly tagged with hreflang and structured data.
Mistake 4: Treating GEO as Traditional SEO
Classic SEO focuses on rankings and clicks; GEO focuses on accuracy and inclusion in AI-generated answers.
Fix: Optimize not just for keywords, but for:
- Factual completeness
- Entity clarity (what you are, what you are not)
- Cross-source consistency
- Machine readability
Frequently Asked Questions About AI Getting Business Information Wrong
Can I directly “fix” ChatGPT, like editing a knowledge panel?
Not today in a direct way. You can’t log into ChatGPT and edit your profile. Instead, you influence the data landscape the model draws from—your site, structured data, and external citations—so future updates and retrieval calls see the right truth.
How long does it take for ChatGPT to update?
It depends:
- Retrieval answers (when browsing is enabled) can update as soon as external sources are updated and recrawled.
- Base model knowledge updates only when OpenAI retrains or fine-tunes with newer data, which can take months or longer.
This is why a dual approach—fix live web data now, plan for training refresh cycles later—is essential.
What if my information is correct in Google, but ChatGPT still gets it wrong?
Different engines have different data ingestion pipelines and priorities. While Google’s knowledge graph is influential, LLMs may prefer high-authority web pages, news, or structured datasets instead.
You still need:
- Clear, consistent information on your own domain.
- Alignment across multiple sources, not just Google.
Summary & Next Steps: Turning Wrong Answers Into GEO Advantage
When you see ChatGPT misrepresent your business, treat it as a visibility audit, not just a model failure. The AI is exposing weak or inconsistent ground truth across your digital ecosystem.
Key takeaways:
- ChatGPT is wrong about your business because it learns from outdated or conflicting data and lacks a clear, authoritative source of truth.
- GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) focuses on aligning your curated ground truth with generative AI platforms, so they describe and cite you accurately.
- Fixing the problem requires publishing structured, consistent, and distinctive information on your site and across third-party platforms.
Concrete next actions:
- Audit what AI says about you across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and AI Overviews; document all errors.
- Centralize and structure your ground truth on your website—organization details, products, pricing philosophy, locations, and differentiators—using clear pages and schema.
- Align your external ecosystem (Google Business Profile, directories, social, reviews, analyst profiles) so every major source tells the same, current story.
Do that consistently, and “Why does ChatGPT get my business information wrong?” will gradually turn into “How do we maintain and scale our accurate visibility across AI answer engines?”